2014
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2013.0087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corn Response to Enhanced‐Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Poultry Litter

Abstract: Nitrogen is one of the most important and costly nutrient inputs for crop production. Farmers are looking for better management practice to enhance production and reduce environmental impact. A 3‐yr field study was established to examine corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield and nutrient uptake resulting from application of 168 kg N ha−1 as urea (U), urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), poultry litter (PL), and similar rate of commercially available enhanced‐efficiency nitrogen fertilizers (EENF) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicated by the grain yield of the nonfertilized control, which was 14% greater than that of the nonfertilized control from a similar study in 2012 and 2013 on the same soil type (Venterea and Coulter, 2015). The findings that Sp by itself compared with single application timing, or UI by itself compared with U, did not improve any measure of crop performance corroborate previous results in rainfed corn systems (Jaynes and Colvin, 2006; Randall et al, 1997; Sistani et al, 2014). The current results demonstrate that a moderate (i.e., 15%) reduction in N rate, when combined with modification of application timing and/or N source, can maintain grain yield and improve NS and NRE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is indicated by the grain yield of the nonfertilized control, which was 14% greater than that of the nonfertilized control from a similar study in 2012 and 2013 on the same soil type (Venterea and Coulter, 2015). The findings that Sp by itself compared with single application timing, or UI by itself compared with U, did not improve any measure of crop performance corroborate previous results in rainfed corn systems (Jaynes and Colvin, 2006; Randall et al, 1997; Sistani et al, 2014). The current results demonstrate that a moderate (i.e., 15%) reduction in N rate, when combined with modification of application timing and/or N source, can maintain grain yield and improve NS and NRE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although Nelson et al (2009) found reduced subsoil NO 3 -N leaching with PCU, grain or silage yield and N uptake of corn did not show a significant advantage for PCU over uncoated urea in silty loam soil in Missouri. Other researchers have also reported no or small corn yield and N uptake differences between enhanced-efficiency N and conventional N fertilizers (Cahill et al, 2010;Sistani et al, 2014;Venterea et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several slow-and controlled-release N fertilizers have been investigated for their potential to minimize N losses and improve the synchronization of N release and crop needs (Cahill et al, 2007(Cahill et al, , 2010Halvorson and Bartolo, 2014;Noellsch et al, 2009;Sistani et al, 2014;Wang and Alva, 1996). Both slowand controlled-release fertilizers slow the availability of urea to the environment, which can reduce leaching or other losses under some environmental conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several enhanced efficiency fertilizers (e.g., controlled release fertilizers and nitrification or urease inhibitors) have been observed to improve the synchronization of N availability and minimize soil N 2 O emissions during the growing season (Nash et al, 2012; Halvorson and Bartolo, 2014; Sistani et al, 2014). Nitrification inhibitors function by directly limiting the rate of ammonium (NH 4 + ) oxidation into nitrite (NO 2 − ) during nitrification which subsequently decreases the substrate nitrate (NO 3 − ) concentration available for denitrification (Zerulla et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%