Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2009
DOI: 10.5772/8311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corn Monitoring and Crop Yield Using Optical and Microwave Remote Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this phase, vegetation scattering will increase in an approximately linear fashion in relation to VWC (Dobson and Ulaby, 1986) and plant density where a wet canopy may increase the C band scattering by as much as 3 dB (Brown et al, 2003). For broad leaf crops, backscatter increases with VWC which eventually results in signal saturation at both C and L bands, whereas small leaf and grain crops have a dynamic backscatter relationship throughout their growth cycle allowing for differentiation of a soil signal (Paloscia, 2002;Soria-Ruiz et al, 2009). In contrast to grain crops, tree canopies tend to backscatter the majority of the radar signal from the crown (Dobson et al, 1992).…”
Section: Reference Contributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During this phase, vegetation scattering will increase in an approximately linear fashion in relation to VWC (Dobson and Ulaby, 1986) and plant density where a wet canopy may increase the C band scattering by as much as 3 dB (Brown et al, 2003). For broad leaf crops, backscatter increases with VWC which eventually results in signal saturation at both C and L bands, whereas small leaf and grain crops have a dynamic backscatter relationship throughout their growth cycle allowing for differentiation of a soil signal (Paloscia, 2002;Soria-Ruiz et al, 2009). In contrast to grain crops, tree canopies tend to backscatter the majority of the radar signal from the crown (Dobson et al, 1992).…”
Section: Reference Contributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Current SAR systems have become increasingly a beneficial source to help agriculture monitoring (Soria-Ruiz et al, 2009, Canisius et al, 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, backscatter intensities are expected to be higher for yam fields than rice. Additionally, previous studies that used SAR data for crop mapping have distinguished between "broad leafed" and "fine/narrow leaf" crops and noted the usefulness of radar data in differentiating them based on their canopy architecture [24,25]. Broad-leaved crops have higher backscatter intensity than fine-leaved crops, due to a high absorption of the radar signal in the latter [75].…”
Section: Contribution Of Tsx Data To Crop Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in vegetation studies, radar backscatter intensities will differ based on the size, shape and orientation of the canopy components (e.g., leaves, stalks, fruit, etc.). Crops with different canopy architecture and cropping characteristics (e.g., planting in mounds) can be distinguished based on their backscatter intensities [23][24][25]. The recent introduction of dual and quad-polarization acquisition modes in many radar satellites (e.g., Radarsat-2, PALSAR, TerraSAR-X) further increases the information content in radar data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%