2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Cork taint” responsible compounds. Determination of haloanisoles and halophenols in cork matrix: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques to improve the quantification of releasable TCA from cork stoppers include headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) [60] and improved extraction methods with drastically reduced extraction time and solvent consumption, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [61], supercritical-fluid extraction (SFE) [62], cloud-point extraction [63] and pressurized-liquid extraction (PLE) [64], with a dynamic extraction duration of 4-15 min. An excellent review of current haloanisole determination methods is provided by Tarasov et al [65]. Apart from the time required for sample pretreatment and the analysis itself (at least 30 min), chromatographic methods are usually expensive and can be only applied in a dedicated laboratory, requiring considerable investment in sophisticated equipment and trained personnel.…”
Section: Biosensors For the Detection Of Haloanisoles In Wine And Bevmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Techniques to improve the quantification of releasable TCA from cork stoppers include headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) [60] and improved extraction methods with drastically reduced extraction time and solvent consumption, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [61], supercritical-fluid extraction (SFE) [62], cloud-point extraction [63] and pressurized-liquid extraction (PLE) [64], with a dynamic extraction duration of 4-15 min. An excellent review of current haloanisole determination methods is provided by Tarasov et al [65]. Apart from the time required for sample pretreatment and the analysis itself (at least 30 min), chromatographic methods are usually expensive and can be only applied in a dedicated laboratory, requiring considerable investment in sophisticated equipment and trained personnel.…”
Section: Biosensors For the Detection Of Haloanisoles In Wine And Bevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a possible limitation of the BERA-based approaches is the rather limited range of detectable TCA concentrations (up to 0.014 µg L −1 ), since higher concentrations would act as toxicants to the cellular biorecognition elements. Quite recently, Tarasov et al [65] published a critical review of the merits and possible restrictions of the applicability of BERA-based biosensor approaches for screening corks for haloanisoles. They emphasized on the potential of the method as an outstanding tool for the express, sensitive and low-cost on-site screening of the cork material, even though not yet suitable for the derivation of quantitative results.…”
Section: Biosensors For the Detection Of Haloanisoles In Wine And Bevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research valorized cork powder and granulates from a phenolic point of view [12], however, little research focused on the recovery of valuable aromatic compounds. On the other hand, a great number of works are related to the offflavors or cork-taint compounds in wine [16][17][18][19]. However, the characterization of the positive aromas of cork stoppers and cork by-products is scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unwanted compounds are subsequently released to the environment, polluting both winery equipment and clean cork stoppers. 2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol can migrate and be transmitted to the wine as a result of its contact with the contaminated material (Tarasov et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%