2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(00)00318-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corium melt quenching tests at low pressure and subcooled water in FARO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only about 0.3-0.5 mm in case KH-2_02. This is significantly lower than was measured in the FARO experiments, where the typical droplet size was in the range of 3-5 mm (Magallon and Huhtiniemi, 2001). But it should be stressed that in FARO experiments the conditions were different.…”
Section: Influence Of Jet Breakup Modellingcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only about 0.3-0.5 mm in case KH-2_02. This is significantly lower than was measured in the FARO experiments, where the typical droplet size was in the range of 3-5 mm (Magallon and Huhtiniemi, 2001). But it should be stressed that in FARO experiments the conditions were different.…”
Section: Influence Of Jet Breakup Modellingcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In the global model the jet fragmentation rate is deduced from the comparison to a standard case (i.e. typical conditions in FARO experiments (Magallon and Huhtiniemi, 2001)) and the size of the created droplets is a user parameter. In the local model the jet fragmentation rate and the size of the created droplets are calculated based on local velocities applying the Kelvin Helmholtz instability model.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the facilities already mentioned, there are many other core degradation and melting material migration integral facilities, such as CODEX, which aims at investigating the core degradation within the light-water reactors (Hózer et al, 2000;Hózer, 2002;Hozer et al, 2003); LOFT, which aims at investigating the PWR core behavior during LOCA-type sequences (Jensen et al, 1989;Cronenberg, 1992); SANDIA-XR, which aims to determine the conditions under which steady lower core blockages are formed and those where they cannot be formed; SCARABEE, which aims to solve fast reactor security analysis and the behavior of fuel pool caused by a sub-assembly melting at full power; QUENCH, which is to explicitly investigate the effect of re-flooding on bundle degradation (Sepold et al, 2007(Sepold et al, , 2009Stuckert et al, 2010Stuckert et al, , 2011Stuckert and Steinbrück, 2014); with the tool FARO, researchers are able to conduct large-scale experiments in order to gain better knowledge of things including structure integration, coolant or molten core with less uncertainties considering relocation and melt progression (Hohmann et al, 1987;Magallon and Huhtiniemi, 2001); and KROTOS, aiming at exploring the problem of steam explosion (Magallon et al, 1996;Huhtiniemi et al, 1997;Annunziato et al, 1999;Huhtiniemi and Magallon, 2001). …”
Section: Experimental Research On Core Degradation and Melting Materimentioning
confidence: 99%