2000
DOI: 10.1006/game.1999.0732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cores of Inventory Centralization Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hartman et al [44] further show that this game has a nonempty core under certain restrictions on the demand distribution. Muller et al [65] relax these restrictions and show that the core is always nonempty.…”
Section: Tutorials In Operations Research C 2006 Informsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hartman et al [44] further show that this game has a nonempty core under certain restrictions on the demand distribution. Muller et al [65] relax these restrictions and show that the core is always nonempty.…”
Section: Tutorials In Operations Research C 2006 Informsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In terms of specific applications to the SCM, Hartman et al [44] considered the newsvendor centralization game, i.e., a game in which multiple retailers decide to centralize their inventory and split profits resulting from the benefits of risk pooling. Hartman et al [44] further show that this game has a nonempty core under certain restrictions on the demand distribution.…”
Section: Tutorials In Operations Research C 2006 Informsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the demands are realized, the inventory is optimally allocated to the retailers. It has been shown that the inventory centralization game has a non-empty core; see Hartman et al [10] and Müller et al [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of specific applications to the SCM, Hartman et al (2000) considered the newsvendor centralization game, i.e., a game in which multiple retailers decide to centralize their inventory and split profits resulting from the benefits of risk pooling. Hartman at al.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%