2005
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cores in random hypergraphs and Boolean formulas

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We describe a technique for determining the thresholds for the appearance of cores in random structures. We use it to determine (i) the threshold for the appearance of a k-core in a random r-uniform hypergraph for all r, k ≥ 2, r + k > 4, and (ii) the threshold for the pure literal rule to find a satisfying assignment for a random instance of r-SAT, r ≥ 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
239
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
239
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of our theorem will be reminiscent of studies of the k-core, the pure literal rule, and other similar problems [14,11,6,7,9]. There, one repeatedly removes vertices (literals, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of our theorem will be reminiscent of studies of the k-core, the pure literal rule, and other similar problems [14,11,6,7,9]. There, one repeatedly removes vertices (literals, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific process finds the k-core of a hypergraph. The k-core itself appears in the analysis of several algorithms, and variations on this underlying process have arisen in the analysis of many problems that on their surface appear quite different, such as low-density paritycheck codes [16], cuckoo hashing [23], [5], [7], [9], and the satisfiability of random formulae [2], [18], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous results were proved for ordinary (not multipartite) hypergraphs in [4,5,15]. We will assume the reader is familiar with [4], and point out the simple modifications of its proof so as to cover the present setting.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The argument of [4] can now be followed from just below its Equation (12). In place of its Equations (15) and (16) we now have…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation