1998
DOI: 10.1029/98gl01937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corehole seismometer development for low‐noise seismic data in a long‐term seafloor observatory

Abstract: Abstract. Longstanding problems unique to marine seismology (in contrast to land-based studies) include high levels of environmental noise, unpredictable instrument placement, short measurement duration, and limited numbers of instruments. Traditional instruments are deployed and recovered from a surface ship with no capability to verify data acquisition until the end of the experiment. They are often poorly sited and usually poorly coupled to the seafloor. Experiments have typically been short in duration wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Each OBS was positioned using an ROV equipped with an ultra-short baseline (USBL) beacon with an estimated absolute horizontal position error of $10 m. Seven of the seismometers were short-period instruments sampled at 128 Hz with a flat frequency response between 1 and 90 Hz (Stakes et al, 1998). One of the instruments was a broadband seismometer with a flat frequency response from less than 1 Hz to approximately 50 Hz, sampled at either 50 or 100 Hz (Romanowicz et al, 2003).…”
Section: A Fin Whale Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Each OBS was positioned using an ROV equipped with an ultra-short baseline (USBL) beacon with an estimated absolute horizontal position error of $10 m. Seven of the seismometers were short-period instruments sampled at 128 Hz with a flat frequency response between 1 and 90 Hz (Stakes et al, 1998). One of the instruments was a broadband seismometer with a flat frequency response from less than 1 Hz to approximately 50 Hz, sampled at either 50 or 100 Hz (Romanowicz et al, 2003).…”
Section: A Fin Whale Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network aperture was 10 km along the axis and 6 km across the axis with a station spacing of 3 km (Wilcock et al, 2009). Seven of the stations were three-component MBARI/GEOSense seismometers (Stakes et al, 1998) with a flat response from 1 to 90 Hz that was sampled at 128 Hz. The eighth station was a three-component MBARI Guralp broadband seismometer (Romanowicz et al, 2006) with a flat response from 2.8 MHz to 50 Hz that was sampled at 50 and 100 Hz.…”
Section: A Seismic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From August 2003 to October 2006, an eight‐station, 10 km aperture array was deployed along the central portion of the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge (Figure b). The array comprised seven short‐period three‐component corehole ocean‐bottom seismometers (OBS) deployed in horizontal drill holes or concrete “seismonuments” [ Stakes et al ., ] and one buried broadband Guralp CMG‐1T OBS [ Romanowicz et al ., ; Stakes et al ., ]. The short‐period sensor comprised three orthogonal Mark Products L‐28LB geophones that have a flat frequency response from 1 to 90 Hz and were sampled at 128 Hz.…”
Section: Keck Seismic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%