2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core–Shell, Ultrasmall Particles, Monoliths, and Other Support Materials in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(353 reference statements)
1
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…could be more pronounced due to wall effects during the packing procedure. Commonly, a smaller psd is given as a reason why the packing of core–shell stationary phases is more uniform compared to fully porous particles leading to a reduced A‐term contribution . The efficiency of the monolithic column is comparable to 3.0 μm fully porous particles, which was also found by Olah et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…could be more pronounced due to wall effects during the packing procedure. Commonly, a smaller psd is given as a reason why the packing of core–shell stationary phases is more uniform compared to fully porous particles leading to a reduced A‐term contribution . The efficiency of the monolithic column is comparable to 3.0 μm fully porous particles, which was also found by Olah et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…between 50 μm and 300 μm. Furthermore, the need for increased detection sensitivity in combination with MS favors miniaturized separation techniques because lower flow rates improve the ionization and ion desorption process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] However, it is difficult to select the optimal packing support, and to find suitable separation conditions, given a specific pressure in an HPLC system; and peripheral studies on the theory have thus far been limited. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] In 2005, Desmet et al invented kinetic performance methods 28 by expanding both Bristow and Knox's, 29 and Poppe's 30 methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of modern LC has targeted fast and efficient separations, with improvements being made in innovative stationary phases and instrumentation . The stationary phase materials in LC can be generally classified into two categories: microspheres and monoliths . Monolith columns can offer fast separation and may be particularly useful for separation of large macromolecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%