2005
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to an open biopsy, both CNB and FNA are less invasive, cause fewer potential complications, and are less expensive. [ 8 16 17 ] With FNA, it is easy to sample material from different parts of large tumors, as compared with biopsies. FNA smears are well-suited for rapid staining and quick preliminary diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to an open biopsy, both CNB and FNA are less invasive, cause fewer potential complications, and are less expensive. [ 8 16 17 ] With FNA, it is easy to sample material from different parts of large tumors, as compared with biopsies. FNA smears are well-suited for rapid staining and quick preliminary diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) varies 62-84% in different studies. [ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although highly sensitive overall, these small biopsies may be nondiagnostic or may erroneously provide a lower tumor grade because of sampling error (13,29,30). In our practice, we have, on occasion, encountered such sampling errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domanski et al . (2005) 6 reported an accuracy of 77% for fine needle aspiration combined with core needle biopsy. Clearly, incisional biopsy is not an inferior technique for diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%