2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02296.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core-mantle relative motion and coupling

Abstract: S U M M A R YCore motion induced by lunisolar precession of the mantle is analysed and compared with experiments and Earth observations. First-order motion has the core axis lagging the mantle axis in precession by a small angle. This misalignment of the axes results in core-mantle relative velocities and displacements over the core-mantle interface as second-order flow. A third-order flow seen in experiments consists of nested fluid cylinders concentric with the core axis. First-order motion can be compared w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power required to drive the geodynamo also appears to be smaller than previously estimated (Christensen and Tilgner, 2004). Experiments contributed in showing that the flow geometry generated in a rotating and precessing spheroidal envelope filled with water, is similar to the flow in the outer core inferred from geomagnetic secular variation (Vanyo, 2004). Finally, numerical reconstructions of the dynamo effect of a precessiondriven flow in a spherical container (Tilgner, 2005) showed that i) laminar and unstable flows maintain the dynamo; ii) for low ratios of viscosity/geostrophic forces (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The power required to drive the geodynamo also appears to be smaller than previously estimated (Christensen and Tilgner, 2004). Experiments contributed in showing that the flow geometry generated in a rotating and precessing spheroidal envelope filled with water, is similar to the flow in the outer core inferred from geomagnetic secular variation (Vanyo, 2004). Finally, numerical reconstructions of the dynamo effect of a precessiondriven flow in a spherical container (Tilgner, 2005) showed that i) laminar and unstable flows maintain the dynamo; ii) for low ratios of viscosity/geostrophic forces (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The most ambitious project within the framework of DRESDYN is a large scale precession dynamo experiment. Precession has been discussed since long as an, at least complementary, energy source of the geodynamo [7,8,9,10,11,12]. This idea is supported by paleomagnetic measurements that have revealed a modulation of the geomagnetic field intensity by the 100 kyr Milanković cycle of the Earth's orbit eccentricity and by the corresponding 41 kyr cycle of the Earth's axis obliquity [13].…”
Section: Precession Driven Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamo action of precession-driven flows is, unfortunately, a largely unsolved problem, despite a number of attempts to apply it to the dynamo of the Earth and other cosmic bodies [55,56,57,58,59]. The DRESDYN precession dynamo experiment was partly motivated by the optimistic numerical estimations obtained by Nore [49,37] for the cylinder, and Krauze [51] for a cube; both pointed consistently to a critical Rm on the order of 700.…”
Section: Precession-driven Dynamos In Cylinders and Cubesmentioning
confidence: 99%