Core-Level Photoelectron Angular Distributions at the Liquid–Vapor Interface

Abstract

Metrics & MoreArticle Recommendations * sı Supporting Information CONSPECTUS: Photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) is a powerful tool for the investigation of liquid−vapor interfaces, with applications in many fields from environmental chemistry to fundamental physics. Among the aspects that have been addressed with PES is the question of how molecules and ions arrange and distribute themselves within the interface, that is, the first few nanometers into solution. This information is of crucial importance, for instance, for atmospheric chemistry, to determine which species are exposed in what concentration to the gas-phase environment. Other topics of interest include the surface propensity of surfactants, their tendency for orientation and self-assembly, as well as ion double layers beneath the liquid−vapor interface. The chemical specificity and surface sensitivity of PES make it in principle well suited for this endeavor. Ideally, one would want to access complete atomic-density distributions along the surface normal, which, however, is difficult to achieve experimentally for reasons to be outlined in this Account. A major complication is the lack of accurate information on electron transport and scattering properties, especially in the kinetic-energy regime below 100 eV, a pre-requisite to retrieving the depth information contained in photoelectron signals.In this Account, we discuss the measurement of the photoelectron angular distributions (PADs) as a way to obtain depth information. Photoelectrons scatter with a certain probability when moving through the bulk liquid before being expelled into a vacuum. Elastic scattering changes the electron direction without a change in the electron kinetic energy, in contrast to inelastic scattering. Random elastic-scattering events usually lead to a reduction of the measured anisotropy as compared to the initial, that is, nascent PAD. This effect that would be considered parasitic when attempting to retrieve information on photoionization dynamics from nascent liquid-phase PADs can be turned into a powerful tool to access information on elastic scattering, and hence probing depth, by measuring core-level PADs. Core-level PADs are relatively unaffected by effects other than elastic scattering, such as orbital character changes due to solvation. By comparing a molecule's gas-phase angular anisotropy, assumed to represent the nascent PAD, with its liquid-phase anisotropy, one can estimate the magnitude of elastic versus inelastic scattering experienced by photoelectrons on their way to the surface from the site at which they were generated. Scattering events increase with increasing depth into solution, and thus it is possible to correlate the observed reduction in angular anisotropy with the depth below the surface along the surface normal.We will showcase this approach for a few examples. In particular, our recent works on surfactant molecules demonstrated that one can indeed probe atomic distances within these molecules with a high sensitivity of ∼1 Å resolution along the ...

Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Oppositely Charged Molecular Switches in the Aqueous Phase: Theory and Experiment

“…It is worth emphasizing that direct comparison of the computed and experimentally determined binding energies is complicated by elastic and inelastic scattering of the photoelectrons by the solvent. Scattering arises from a complex interplay of multiple factors, including solubility of the switches (related to probing depth), energy of the ionizing radiation, solvent, and angle of detection of the electrons. ,− It can be argued that inelastic scattering may only allow higher energy electrons to escape the solvent and therefore give an apparent binding energy higher than the true one. However, given that the photoelectron spectra can be fitted accurately using Gaussian curves in Figure , this suggests that scattering is not significant enough to distort the spectra .…”

Spiers Memorial Lecture: New directions in molecular scattering

“…421 The cylindrical, liquid micro-jet of Faubel, Schlemmer and Toennies 422 is an innovation that has raised the ambitions of this eld and, since its invention, efforts have intensied to study the vacuum/water interface. For example, with the ability to introduce liquid water into a vacuum chamber, photoelectron spectroscopy became possible, for example using core-level photoelectron spectroscopy 423 to measure work functions of liquid-water surfaces. 424 However, methods for scattering molecules from surfaces of high-vaporpressure liquids like water are not yet fully mature.…”

Inversion model for extracting chemically resolved depth profiles across liquid interfaces of various configurations from XPS data: PROPHESY

“…For most aqueous solutions containing multiple species, it is currently not known whether the observed surface enhancement is due to differences in the density profiles of the various species or competition for limited surface sites between species with different surface propensities (Prisle et al, 2012;Werner et al, 2014Werner et al, , 2018O ¨hrwall et al, 2015). It is possible to derive relative density profiles using angular-resolved XPS, as demonstrated for solutions containing environmental organic compounds (Dupuy et al, 2022(Dupuy et al, , 2023, and in particular organosulfates (Lewis et al, 2019). For these mixtures, the relative surface abundances of co-solutes observed with XPS was found to originate from different peak intensity, rather than peak depth, of the radial density profiles with respect to the surface.…”