2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02742009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core-level electronic spectra in ADC(2) approximation for polarization propagator: Carbon monoxide and nitrogen molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental motivation for such approximation, originally proposed by Cederbaum, Domcke, and Schirmer,18 lies in the large difference in energy and in the localization in space between core and valence orbitals. The CVS approximation was first implemented within the algebraic diagrammatic construction [19][20][21] scheme 22,23 and later extended to TD-DFT approaches. also been presented in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental motivation for such approximation, originally proposed by Cederbaum, Domcke, and Schirmer,18 lies in the large difference in energy and in the localization in space between core and valence orbitals. The CVS approximation was first implemented within the algebraic diagrammatic construction [19][20][21] scheme 22,23 and later extended to TD-DFT approaches. also been presented in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is followed by a sequence of much weaker discrete bands associated to Rydberg transitions: first, the 1s → 3sσ band at about 292.4 eV (C) and 539 eV (O) and second, the 1s → 3pπ band at 293.3 eV (C) and 540 eV (O). A series of high-resolution experiments [16,[43][44][45][46][47] have clarified the vibrational progressions of such transitions, but this aspect is beyond the scope of the present work.…”
Section: Carbon Monoxidementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that, for the C 1s → π * band, Triguero et al [14] reported, using the DFT-TP method, nonrelativistic results for the excitation energies between 287.5 and 288.9 eV, with oscillator strengths between 0.162 and 0.164, depending on the functional adopted. With a revised ADC(2) approach in combination with the core-valence separation (CVS) approximation, Trofimov et al [16] [14] results are between 535.1 and 536.1 eV (f = 0.066), ADC(2) yields 532.53 eV and 0.07 [16], the QRHF/EA-EOMCCSD method [50] gives 533.98 eV and 0.031, and its open-shell variant [50] yields 534.15 eV and 0.083. Similar to water, using the CPP approach at the TDDFT level, Ekström et al [20,21] reported an absorption spectrum for the C edge qualitatively consistent with the experimental spectrum, but with shifts of as much as +4.8 eV (LB94) and +14.8 eV (CAM-B3LYP) and weaker intensity.…”
Section: Carbon Monoxidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 Initially a 6-311++G(2d,2p) basis set was used as in a previous N 2 XPS study. 34 Photo-ionization was approximated by excitation of the core electrons into unbound Rydberg states. For this purpose a diffuse s function with orbital exponent 0.0001 was added to the basis.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%