2020
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core features of callous–unemotional traits: Network analysis of the inventory of callous–unemotional traits in offender and community samples

Abstract: Objective: Callous-unemotional (CU) traits have been added as a specifier labeled with "Limited Prosocial Emotion" used to diagnose conduct disorder in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. However, little is known about the core features of CU traits. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most central component of CU traits from a network perspective. Method: Network analysis was applied to investigate the network structure of CU traits operationalized by the Invento… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Betweenness is a measure of a node’s connective value in the network and is defined as the frequency with which a node links to two other nodes on the shortest path possible. 52 According to research findings, closeness and betweenness cannot be reliably estimated, so we only considered node strength when comparing centrality differences. In addition, the research also included expected influence (EI), one of the most reliable centrality measures, which was utilized to get the total of the absolute values of each node’s connection weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Betweenness is a measure of a node’s connective value in the network and is defined as the frequency with which a node links to two other nodes on the shortest path possible. 52 According to research findings, closeness and betweenness cannot be reliably estimated, so we only considered node strength when comparing centrality differences. In addition, the research also included expected influence (EI), one of the most reliable centrality measures, which was utilized to get the total of the absolute values of each node’s connection weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers rated each item on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 ‘not at all true’ to 3 ‘definitely true’. The Mandarin translation of the ICU has good internal consistency for the total ICU score ( α = 0.82) and is a valid measure in Chinese preschool children (Deng et al, 2016 ). Alpha for the total ICU score in the current sample was 0.87.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many studies have applied network analysis to investigate how symptoms of different mental disorders are interrelated, particularly in the fields of anxiety and mood-related disorders (reviewed by Contreras et al, 2019). In the field of externalizing disorders, network analysis has been applied to symptoms of ADHD (Burns et al, 2022;Goh et al, 2020Goh et al, , 2021aMartel et al, 2016Martel et al, , 2021Preszler et al, 2020;Silk et al, 2019), ODD (Smith et al, 2017), or ADHD and ODD together (Martel et al, 2017;Preszler & Burns, 2019), to CU traits (Bansal et al, 2020;Deng et al, 2021), and to CU traits in conjunction with ODD and CD (Bansal et al, 2021), in samples ranging from preschool age to adulthood. Furthermore, a recent study explored the relations between ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and temperament traits, and found support for the primary role of effortful control as a potential risk marker for the characterization of ADHD across childhood and adolescence (Goh et al, 2021a, b).…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%