Auraria Library is a busy library with a growing electronic resources collection and a rather homegrown approach to electronic resource troubleshooting. Without a full-time position dedicated to access issues such as broken links, URL resolver problems, off-campus access issues, and network outages, troubleshooting is the responsibility of a small team of library staff who are otherwise busy with their respective primary job duties. The team is fundamentally reactive without much time to do more than resolve immediate access problems. Researching, purchasing, and implementing troubleshooting tracking software or overhauling the troubleshooting workflow would require more time and resources than the team could offer. Even if the team had the resources to implement a new system, it would be difficult to know how to change the workflow to create more efficiency because there were no data about how efficiently the team was working or what kinds of issues they were resolving. The team recognized that vast amounts of data about the nature of access issues, and data about the team itself, were being collected in the problem reports to which the team responded. Two members of the team decided to analyze the problem reports in detail through a simple process in order to assess the functionality of the troubleshooting team and answer some fundamental questions about the nature of Auraria's access problems. The two-person team also suspected that understanding the problem reports more deeply would lead to improvements in current troubleshooting methods. Better understanding would allow the team to be more proactive and to get ahead of electronic access issues before they were reported.