1993
DOI: 10.1145/167954.166246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Core based trees (CBT)

Abstract: One of the central problems in one-to-many wide-area communications is forming the delivery tree - the collection of nodes and links that a multicast packet traverses. Significant problems remain to be solved in the area of multicast tree formation, the problem of scaling being paramount among these.In this paper we show how the current IP multicast architecture scales poorly (by scale poorly, we mean consume too much memory, bandwidth, or too many processing resources), and subsequently present a multicast pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many multicast routing protocols have been proposed for mobile ad-hoc networks that have been categorized in Fig 1. Existing multicast routing protocol in MANETs can be classified into three catogories as, tree-based routing protocols [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], mesh-based routing protocols [14][15][16], and hybrid-based routing protocols [17,18]. Tree-based routing protocols establish a tree structure during data packet transmission from source host to a set of destination host, while mesh-based routing protocols build a mesh structure that provides redundant routing path between the source host to a set of destination host, if in a case transmission channel is failure between two nodes then there is no need of recomputation of a mesh structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many multicast routing protocols have been proposed for mobile ad-hoc networks that have been categorized in Fig 1. Existing multicast routing protocol in MANETs can be classified into three catogories as, tree-based routing protocols [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], mesh-based routing protocols [14][15][16], and hybrid-based routing protocols [17,18]. Tree-based routing protocols establish a tree structure during data packet transmission from source host to a set of destination host, while mesh-based routing protocols build a mesh structure that provides redundant routing path between the source host to a set of destination host, if in a case transmission channel is failure between two nodes then there is no need of recomputation of a mesh structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, each receiver r in mul- 1 Any multicast groups can have the same receivers. Therefore, the sets R t cannot be disjoint.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced the concept of the CBT algorithm, which builds a bidirectional and group-shared tree rooting at a single "multicasting core" and spans to all of the group member nodes with minimal cost, out of many multicast routing protocols (DVMRP, PIM, MOSPF, 6 and so on [1,27,28]), as the method for generating a multicast tree, because a multicast tree has to be readily represented in the genetic representation presented in Section 4. In order to apply the CBT algorithm to this problem, first, the maximum bandwidth available from the multicasting core to each destination is computed using a Dijkstra-like algorithm, called the computation algorithm of maximum bandwidth, as follows.…”
Section: Single Multicast Tree Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process of sending the control information so as to maintain the view consistency among all users requires a tremendous amount of communication bandwidth. Recent research work on multicasting techniques [3], [10], [11] can help to reduce the network resource demand. In [22], [23], the authors propose approaches to connect all participating clients using different communication subgraph construction algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%