2014
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpu034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copyright in the EU: in search of (in)flexibilities

Abstract: Over the past few years consensus has grown around the idea that current EU legislative framework for copyright lacks the flexibility needed to accommodate emerging interests, specifically those arising in connection with technological development. The principal directive in the area of copyright-Directive 2001/29/EC (the 'InfoSoc Directive')-1 purported to harmonise, among other things, the main exclusive rights (reproduction, communication and making available to the public, and distribution) by providing a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The InfoSoc Directive does not expressly entail provisions on an adaptation right or a free use doctrine, let alone a right to remix or sample. At the same time, it is commonly understood that exclusive rights are fully harmonized on a European level 15 and that the list of possible limitations and exceptions is exhaustive 16 .…”
Section: A Relevance Of Eu Fundamental Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The InfoSoc Directive does not expressly entail provisions on an adaptation right or a free use doctrine, let alone a right to remix or sample. At the same time, it is commonly understood that exclusive rights are fully harmonized on a European level 15 and that the list of possible limitations and exceptions is exhaustive 16 .…”
Section: A Relevance Of Eu Fundamental Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…176 The EU pre-emption doctrine is also relevant to EU copyright law. 177 The basis for a comprehensive unifying copyright Regulation would be Article 118 TFEU. 178 This statutory basis and the ensuing application of pre-emption leaves the extent of the actual harmonisation to judicial interpretation by the national courts first and, finally and decisively, to the CJEU.…”
Section: Exceptions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%