1987
DOI: 10.1177/107769908706400112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copyright and New Technology: Implications for Audiovisual Works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supreme Court case (Bunker, 2010;Kozlowski, Bullard & Deets, 2009;Hovland & Taylor, 1990). Some authors opt for a relatively straightforward textual explanation of the application of a statute (Collins, 1987;Middleton, 1979). Others analyze a single court decision (Pritchard, 2013;Gross, 1973) or administrative agency adjudication (Gleason, 1991) and then discuss the implications.…”
Section: Methodsological Approaches Of Mass Communication Law and Polimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Supreme Court case (Bunker, 2010;Kozlowski, Bullard & Deets, 2009;Hovland & Taylor, 1990). Some authors opt for a relatively straightforward textual explanation of the application of a statute (Collins, 1987;Middleton, 1979). Others analyze a single court decision (Pritchard, 2013;Gross, 1973) or administrative agency adjudication (Gleason, 1991) and then discuss the implications.…”
Section: Methodsological Approaches Of Mass Communication Law and Polimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still other doctrinal articles collect and analyze a series of lower-court cases on an issue the U.S. Supreme Court has not addressed directly (Stevens, 1989), and they may impose a time frame for their analysis-a decade, for example (Sneed & Stonecipher, 1986). Scholars apply existing legal concepts to technological developments (Hightower, 1975;Collins, 1987;O'Neill, 1994). Quarterly.…”
Section: Methodsological Approaches Of Mass Communication Law and Polimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Copyright Act of 1976 has been an important topic for JMCQ . Concerns related to that copyright revision included its elimination of broader protections often available through state common-law copyright (Chaney, 1978), ambiguities it left as to what extent educators could legally videotape television programs for classroom use (Francois, 1980), the need for free-lance authors to avoid giving up rights they could otherwise retain with the new revision (Middleton, 1979), and its argued inadequate protection of computer programs such as the type used to generate commercials (Collins, 1987).…”
Section: Copyrightmentioning
confidence: 99%