2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copy number variations in children with brain malformations and refractory epilepsy

Abstract: Brain malformations are a major cause of therapy-refractory epilepsy as well as neurological and developmental disabilities in children. This study examined the frequency and the nature of copy number variations among children with structural brain malformations and refractory epilepsy. The medical records of all children born between 1990 and 2009 in the epilepsy registry at the Astrid Lindgren's Children's Hospital were reviewed and 86 patients with refractory epilepsy and various brain malformations were id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we performed WES CNV analyses on 168 “unsolved” families with epilepsy and identified pathogenic CNVs in 18 patients (10.7%) (Table ). Our detection rates of pathogenic CNVs by WES‐based CNV analysis are similar to a previous report using microarray (3.2%‐10.9%) and WES‐based (2.9%) analyses in epilepsy. Different diagnostic yields of WES‐based CNV detection may arise from different phenotypes, numbers of patients with/without microarray prescreening, WES data quality, or different detection tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we performed WES CNV analyses on 168 “unsolved” families with epilepsy and identified pathogenic CNVs in 18 patients (10.7%) (Table ). Our detection rates of pathogenic CNVs by WES‐based CNV analysis are similar to a previous report using microarray (3.2%‐10.9%) and WES‐based (2.9%) analyses in epilepsy. Different diagnostic yields of WES‐based CNV detection may arise from different phenotypes, numbers of patients with/without microarray prescreening, WES data quality, or different detection tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, an “exome‐first approach,” WES for evaluating both SNVs and CNVs, could be an alternative to avoid a “diagnostic odyssey,” as in our Case 738, and may save time and cost . It has been reported that SNVs and CNVs involving epilepsy genes account for 10.0% to 48.5% and 3.2% to 10.9% of genetic causes, respectively. In our study using WES, pathogenic SNVs were identified in 126 (42.9%) and CNVs in 18 (6.1%) out of 294 families (Figure A), being compatible with these previous data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations