2007
DOI: 10.1300/j104v44n03_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copy Cataloging for Print and Video Monographs in Two Academic Libraries: A Case Study of Editing Required for Accuracy and Completeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After interpreting and analyzing the data, normalizations have been made as referred to Myall and Chambers (2007); Shin (2003); Each Editing type is normalized to the total item records of study, and total number of editing to classify the most and least to be edited. The necessary data has been collected into the spreadsheet using different functions of Microsoft excel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After interpreting and analyzing the data, normalizations have been made as referred to Myall and Chambers (2007); Shin (2003); Each Editing type is normalized to the total item records of study, and total number of editing to classify the most and least to be edited. The necessary data has been collected into the spreadsheet using different functions of Microsoft excel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very similar to the present study of research. Myall and Chambers (2007) conducted a study comparing the extent of editing required for records to meet necessary bibliographic standards during copy cataloging for Print and Video Books in Two different Academic Libraries. The result showed that records for print Books acquired at the two institutions usually required little or no editing, while records for video/DVD Books required considerably more editing.…”
Section: Purpose Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Librarians at those institutions perform minimal institutional-level editing of videorecords to conform to OCLC's requirements for full cataloging (I-Level). 9 The average videorecording record required about six edits, as compared to two edits for print monographs. The fields requiring the most additions or corrections were not identified.…”
Section: Record Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%