2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work

Abstract: Background Over the last almost 20 years COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) has become a well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work. In Germany, a first validated version of COPSOQ was introduced in 2005. After the COPSOQ international network took over responsibility for the development of COPSOQ, a new version was published in 2019 (COPSOQ III). The German version of this questionnaire is now to be validated. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
62
2
9

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
62
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our sample was much smaller, similar results were shown for German practice owners, with a JS score of 77.16 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 63.1 [27]) and a high WPC score of 64.03 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 39.0 [27]). In contrast, data from the German COPSOQ reference population with over 200,000 participants from various occupational groups showed much lower WPC and JS scores [27]. Since the practice owners were older on average, the question arises whether different work values between the generations are responsible for our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our sample was much smaller, similar results were shown for German practice owners, with a JS score of 77.16 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 63.1 [27]) and a high WPC score of 64.03 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 39.0 [27]). In contrast, data from the German COPSOQ reference population with over 200,000 participants from various occupational groups showed much lower WPC and JS scores [27]. Since the practice owners were older on average, the question arises whether different work values between the generations are responsible for our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In a large Canadian 2013 National Physician´s Survey, with more than 5000 family physician participants, 72% were satisfied with their professional lives, while 43.5% were not satisfied with their work-life balance [ 26 ]. Although our sample was much smaller, similar results were shown for German practice owners, with a JS score of 77.16 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 63.1 [ 27 ]) and a high WPC score of 64.03 (mean COPSOQ reference population = 39.0 [ 27 ]). In contrast, data from the German COPSOQ reference population with over 200,000 participants from various occupational groups showed much lower WPC and JS scores [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It combines selected aspects of several important psychosocial theories related to occupational strain, like (amongst others) the Demand-Control-(Support) [ 21 , 22 ] or the Effort-Reward-Imbalance model [ 23 ]. The latest version, COPSOQ III, was recently evaluated in Germany [ 24 ]. It consists of 84 items and 31 scales covering risk and resource factors assigned to the domains “demands”, “influence and possibilities for development”, “social relations and leadership” and “additional factors” as well as “effects” of work related strain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher values on the “emotional demands” scale indicate that participants perceive their work as more emotionally challenging; higher values for “meaning of work” indicate that the work is perceived as rather meaningful and important). In total, reliability of COPSOQ III scales proved to be good or even very good as 28 of its 31 scales show Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.7 and homogeneity is on a satisfying to even good level for 24 scales in terms of inter class correlation as measure of congruence (ICC ≥ 0.5) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation