Copping stress as predictor of life satisfaction among older adults&lt;p&gt;Yaşlılarda yaşam doyumunun yordayıcısı olarak stresle başa çıkma

Var, Esra Çalik; Demirkazık, Çiçek Nilsu Varlıklar; Çepni, Şükran Kolay

doi:10.14687/jhs.v13i3.3958

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in their study on life satisfaction and coping with stress in the elderly, Calık Var et al (2016) found that optimistic and seeking social support strategies positively predicted life satisfaction in individuals with an average age of 68 (Calık Var et al, 2016). These strategies did not have a significant contribution in the present study because the average age of patients was 58 and the self-confident style was used more actively.…”

Section: Ta B L Econtrasting

confidence: 60%

“…Self-efficacy and coping with stress in chronic diseases affect the course of the disease (Ceyhan & Unsal, 2018;Knowles et al, 2020;Ozdemir & Tasci, 2013;Tielemans et al, 2015). International studies on these issues related to chronic diseases observed that there was a relationship between patients' self-efficacies and their coping strategies in many disease groups such as stroke, cancer, diabetes mellitus, respiratory system diseases and joint/connective tissue diseases (Benka et al, 2014;Calık Var et al, 2016;Ceyhan & Unsal, 2018;Geng et al, 2018;Knowles et al, 2020;Koehler et al, 2009;Saconi et al, 2020;Tielemans et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2008). There was a strong relationship between coping and self-efficacy of patients with cancer and stroke Chirico, Serpentini, et al, 2017;Geng et al, 2018;Koehler et al, 2009;Tielemans et al, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Predictor of self‐efficacy in individuals with chronic disease: Stress‐coping strategies

Bakan

İnci

2021

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and Objectives This study aims to investigate the relationship between stress‐coping strategies of individuals with chronic diseases and their self‐efficacy. Background Self‐efficacy and coping with stress in chronic diseases affect the course of the disease. Design The sample of this methodological study consisted of 178 patients who were hospitalised in a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2018. Methods Data were collected by the face‐to‐face interview method using a Patient Information Form, Stress‐Coping Styles Scale and Self‐Efficacy Scale. This study followed STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies. Results The study found that there was a strong relationship between patients’ coping strategies and their self‐efficacies and that the variables that predict self‐efficacy in order of importance were self‐confident approach (β = .41), the helpless approach (β = −0.24) and the submissive approach (β = −0.15), respectively. The study also found that the optimistic approach and the seeking social support approach had no significant contribution to the model. Conclusions The most important predictor of self‐efficacy in individuals with chronic disease was the self‐confident approach, which was one of the problem‐oriented coping strategies. Therefore, patients should be taught to use effective methods to cope with stress to increase their self‐efficacy, and their self‐confidence should be supported. Relevance to clinical practice In individuals with chronic disease, self‐efficacy has an important role to get better psycho‐social adaptation. To determine patients’ self‐efficacy levels and predictors will guide nursing initiatives.

show abstract

Section: Ta B L Econtrasting

confidence: 60%