2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b19277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper Nanowire Dispersion through an Electrostatic Dispersion Mechanism for High-Performance Flexible Transparent Conducting Films and Optoelectronic Devices

Abstract: Highly dispersed copper nanowire (CuNW) is an essential prerequisite for its practical application in various electronic devices. At present, the dispersion of CuNW is almost realized through the steric hindrance effect of polymers. However, the high post-treatment temperature of polymers makes this dispersion mechanism impractical for many actual applications. Here, after investigating the relationship between the electrostatic dispersion force and influence factors, an electrostatic dispersion mechanism is r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of TCFs on the superhydrophilic antireflective substrates was compared to literature TCFs by standardizing the reported values (Figure E). We have listed their reported transmittance values in Table S1; however it should be noted that their true values may be lower, as the transmittance of coatings often remove substrate reflections as background. ,,− Reported R s values of TCFs composed of graphene or CNTs are typically much lower than those of TCFs composed of individual graphene sheets or nanotubes. This is due to the nature of the percolative network formed, where individual nanotubes cannot be fused together as metal nanowires can, leading to high contact resistance at CNT junctions .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of TCFs on the superhydrophilic antireflective substrates was compared to literature TCFs by standardizing the reported values (Figure E). We have listed their reported transmittance values in Table S1; however it should be noted that their true values may be lower, as the transmittance of coatings often remove substrate reflections as background. ,,− Reported R s values of TCFs composed of graphene or CNTs are typically much lower than those of TCFs composed of individual graphene sheets or nanotubes. This is due to the nature of the percolative network formed, where individual nanotubes cannot be fused together as metal nanowires can, leading to high contact resistance at CNT junctions .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample had a T 550 of 94.9% and a R s of 220 Ω sq –1 . (E) Performance of our TCFs compared to other materials and commercially available TCFs. ,,− …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work using low-post-treatment CuNWs reported flexible OSCs with a PCE of 8.29%. [203] Besides metal NWs, the utilization of ordered metal meshes/ grids in flexible OSCs has attracted sizable research interests. With the advances in micro-and nanomanufacturing technologies, electrodes based on metal meshes/grids are produced with greater control over the geometry features.…”
Section: Flexible Oscs Using Transparent Metal-based Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu nanocrystals are promising materials for catalysis, conductive ink, , and electrodes in transparent, flexible, and/or stretchable devices, such as touch screens, flexible displays, photovoltaics, and flexible heaters. In these applications, nanocrystal morphology can significantly impact performance, ,,, which motivates the study of shape-controlled growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%