1999
DOI: 10.1006/mchj.1999.1784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper(II)-Selective Membrane Electrode Based on a Recently Synthesized Macrocyclic Diamide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…44,51 To assess the selectivity of the proposed silver ion-selective electrode over other cations, M n+ , the methods of fixed interference (FIM) 52 and mixed solution (MSM) 53 were employed as described in our previous publications. 12,13,[28][29][30][31]40 The resulting K Ag,M values for the proposed Ag + ion-selective electrode are summarized in Table 1. As seen, in all cases studied, the selectivity coefficients are in the order of 10 −3 and smaller, emphasizing the highly selective behavior of the proposed membrane electrode for Ag + ion over many other monovalent and divalent cations of vastly different soft-hard character.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,51 To assess the selectivity of the proposed silver ion-selective electrode over other cations, M n+ , the methods of fixed interference (FIM) 52 and mixed solution (MSM) 53 were employed as described in our previous publications. 12,13,[28][29][30][31]40 The resulting K Ag,M values for the proposed Ag + ion-selective electrode are summarized in Table 1. As seen, in all cases studied, the selectivity coefficients are in the order of 10 −3 and smaller, emphasizing the highly selective behavior of the proposed membrane electrode for Ag + ion over many other monovalent and divalent cations of vastly different soft-hard character.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 compared the selectivity coefficients of the Cu(II) sensor with those of the best previously Cu(II) electrodes reported in the literature by other researchers. 8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] As it is obvious, the selectivity coefficients of the electrode for majority of cations, that tested is superior respect with the best previously reported copper sensor.…”
Section: Selectivity Of the Cu(ii) Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5 A wide variety of neutral carriers, including small size thia-substituted crown ethers, 6,7 benzo-substituted macrocyclic diamides, 8 anthraquinone derivatives, 9 acyclic neutral ligands with dithiocarbamate groups, 10,11 and with nitrogen atoms, 12 hydroxamate derivatives, 13 aza-thioether crowns, 14 calix [4]arenas, 15 naphthol derivatives, 16 and Schiff's bases, [17][18][19][20][21][22] have been used as carriers in the construction of copper(II) ion selective membrane electrodes. However, most of these copper sensors have problems such as: (i) narrow working concentration range, (ii) high detection limit and (iii) strong interfering effect of cations as follow Fe 3+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , Hg 2+ , Ag 2+ , Sr 2+ , Na + , Cs + and K + .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41] In Table 4, the selectivity coefficients for some common interfering ions of the proposed ions-selective electrodes based on AQ are compared with the corresponding values previously reported for PVC-membrane copper(II)-selective electrodes based on different neutral ionophores. [10][11][12][13][15][16][17] As can be seen, in most cases, the proposed electrodes (especially the CGE) show superior selectivity behavior to the PVC membrane sensors prepared previously. Moreover, the limit of detection obtained with the proposed CGE shows an improvement of over one order of magnitude over the most sensitive copper-selective 878 ANALYTICAL SCIENCES AUGUST 2002, VOL.…”
Section: Potmentioning
confidence: 99%