2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2013.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper(II) interacting with the non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug flufenamic acid: Structure, antioxidant activity and binding to DNA and albumins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
6
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar bands have been reported for the Cu(II) complexes with the NSAIDs mefenamic acid, diflunisal, naproxen and diclofenac [5][6][7]24]. Fig.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar bands have been reported for the Cu(II) complexes with the NSAIDs mefenamic acid, diflunisal, naproxen and diclofenac [5][6][7]24]. Fig.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, complexes 1-6 exhibit higher DPPH, similar hydroxyl and lower ABTS scavenging activity in comparison to the Zn(II)-tolfenamato analogues [15], while the LOX inhibitory activity is of the same magnitude. The DPPH and hydroxyl scavenging activity of complexes 1-6 is higher than their naproxenato, mefenamato and flufenamato copper(II) analogues [5,7,47], in contrast to their ABTS scavenging activity which is lower. Additionally, the LOX inhibition activity of complexes 1-6 is among the highest found in comparison to their copper(II) mefenamato and flufenamato analogues [5,47].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that complex II has a higher binding constant value compared to complex I implying a relatively strong association to HSA. Also, the values of K b for the above complexes are much higher than those of metal complexes reported earlier, which reflected better interaction probability of these complexes compared to other therapeutic agents [34][35][36].The number of binding sites (n) was approximately equal to 1, indicating that there was one site for the binding of Pd(II) complexes to HSA molecule [37].…”
Section: Binding Constant and Binding Sitesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The diffusion-control behavior was evident from the linear plot of the voltammetric response as a function of ν 1/2 . From the slope of the obtained line, diffusion coefficient for free AZT (D f ) was calculated as 5.86× 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 , whereas for the AZT-DNA complex, D b was reduced to 2.90 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 .The negative shift in potential of C 1 during successive additions of DNA, confirms the nonintercalative nature of the interaction, indeed it refers to electrostatic interactions with DNA[21,[25][26][27][28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%