2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper(II) complex with 6-methylpyridine-2-carboxyclic acid: Experimental and computational study on the XRD, FT-IR and UV–Vis spectra, refractive index, band gap and NLO parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between experimental/theoretical COO − modes were found to be 375–267/401–293 cm −1 originating from the monodentate coordination via carboxylate group. These results are consistent with those of different metal complexes . In complex 5 , the asymmetric/symmetric COO − stretching modes of OAc ligand appear at 1586/1239 cm −1 and 1596/1258 cm −1 (Table with experimental and theoretical results).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The differences between experimental/theoretical COO − modes were found to be 375–267/401–293 cm −1 originating from the monodentate coordination via carboxylate group. These results are consistent with those of different metal complexes . In complex 5 , the asymmetric/symmetric COO − stretching modes of OAc ligand appear at 1586/1239 cm −1 and 1596/1258 cm −1 (Table with experimental and theoretical results).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The α values of complexes 1 – 6 are found to be in the range 67.6 × 10 −24 and 36.3 × 10 −24 esu, these values being ca 3.07 and ca 1.65 times greater than that of pNA (22 × 10 −24 esu). All results are comparable with our previous results for the same parameters . It could be suggested that these marked differences can stem from the electron‐accepting and electron‐donating groups, as well as chemical/coordination environment in compounds/metal complexes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations