2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper complexes of tripodal κ6N-donor ligands: A structural, EPR spectroscopic and electrochemical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectral width is significantly smaller than the widths reported by Breher et al [29] for both the free ligand (∆δ = 1.30 ppm) and the respective copper(I) complex (∆δ = 1.15 ppm). By contrast, the resonances of the aromatic protons (and H 5 ) of the iron(II) complex are spread out over a 2.11 ppm range.…”
Section: Structural Characteristics Ofcontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spectral width is significantly smaller than the widths reported by Breher et al [29] for both the free ligand (∆δ = 1.30 ppm) and the respective copper(I) complex (∆δ = 1.15 ppm). By contrast, the resonances of the aromatic protons (and H 5 ) of the iron(II) complex are spread out over a 2.11 ppm range.…”
Section: Structural Characteristics Ofcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Actually, L and derived ligands are known to facilitate the synthesis of trigonal prismatic complexes [29][30][31]. This correlation acknowledges previous structure-spin state correlations [32], that are based on structural-chemical considerations going back to the early 1970s [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…at 150 K. The significant divergence in bond lengths with respect to donor nature (đ(Fe-N pyr ) − đ(Fe-N aldimine ) ≈ 6 pm) points to a non-isotropic ligand field around iron(II); aldimine N is an intrinsically stronger donor than pyridine N. We note, however, that the order of metal−N bond lengths is inverted in the related copper(I) and copper(II) complexes of Breher et al [42].…”
Section: Solid-state Structuresmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In sum, the coordination sphere can be classified as octahedral with significant trigonal distortion along the pseudo-threefold symmetry axis as defined by the vector S−P−Fe. At this point, it is important to note that Breher et al observed even more pronounced trigonal distortion after coordination of a very closely related hexa-imine ligand (R = H in the copper analogues of 1) to copper(II) ions [42], while the coordination of the respective copper(I) [42] and yttrium(III) [43] complexes is essentially trigonal-prismatic.…”
Section: Solid-state Structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Substantial trigonal torsion along the SCO coordinate was expected to emerge through the combination of octahedral-directing iron­(II) and trigonal-prismatic directing N 6 ligands L 1 – 3 (Scheme ). Ligands of this type actually have shown structural flexibility in response to the preference of the metal ion: While the ls iron­(II) complex of the thiophosphoryl-capped ligand L 3 retains octahedral coordination, L 1 and its pyridine analogues previously provided broad access to trigonal-prismatic coordination. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%