2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper Bromide Hole Transport Layer for Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells

Abstract: We demonstrate that replacing poly­(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) with copper bromide (CuBr) as a hole transport layer (HTL) leads to highly efficient and stable inverted perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The CuBr-based devices showed an average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.73% and a maximum PCE of 17.65%. Devices with PEDOT:PSS as the HTL had an average PCE of 10.94%. The active layer films fabricated on CuBr showed larger grain size distribution and improved crystallini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For M3, to obtain a higher PCE (approximately 19.6%), a suitable HTL of either a higher bandgap range, i.e., 2.7−3.0 eV, along with the affinity range of 2.25−2.30 eV, is required or the lower bandgap range is 2.5− 2.7 eV, with the affinity range of 2.45−2.65 eV. For M4, to obtain a higher PCE (approximately 19.6%), a suitable HTL of either a higher bandgap range, i.e., 2.7−3.0 eV, along with the affinity range of 2.25−2.30 eV, is required or the lower MoO x , 51 pp-sprio-OMeTAD, 52 pm-sprio-OMeTAD, 52 SGT-407, 52 OMeTPA-FA, 53 CuBr, 54 PTAA, 55 and NPB. 56 Panels a−e of Figure 3 show the energy band diagram (EBD) of PSCs with different active layers: M1, FASnI 3 ; M2, (FASnI 3 ) 0.8 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.2 ; M3, (FASnI 3 ) 0.6 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.4 ; M4, (FASnI 3 ) 0.4 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.6 ; and M5, MAPbI 3 , with TiO 2 as the ETL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For M3, to obtain a higher PCE (approximately 19.6%), a suitable HTL of either a higher bandgap range, i.e., 2.7−3.0 eV, along with the affinity range of 2.25−2.30 eV, is required or the lower bandgap range is 2.5− 2.7 eV, with the affinity range of 2.45−2.65 eV. For M4, to obtain a higher PCE (approximately 19.6%), a suitable HTL of either a higher bandgap range, i.e., 2.7−3.0 eV, along with the affinity range of 2.25−2.30 eV, is required or the lower MoO x , 51 pp-sprio-OMeTAD, 52 pm-sprio-OMeTAD, 52 SGT-407, 52 OMeTPA-FA, 53 CuBr, 54 PTAA, 55 and NPB. 56 Panels a−e of Figure 3 show the energy band diagram (EBD) of PSCs with different active layers: M1, FASnI 3 ; M2, (FASnI 3 ) 0.8 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.2 ; M3, (FASnI 3 ) 0.6 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.4 ; M4, (FASnI 3 ) 0.4 (MAPbI 3 ) 0.6 ; and M5, MAPbI 3 , with TiO 2 as the ETL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pure lead-halide device (M5, MAPbI 3 as an absorber) delivers 19.8% PCE, with the HTL having a bandgap range of 2.9–3.0 eV and affinity range of 2.55–2.65 eV. Some of the potential HTL materials falling in the range of considered electron affinity and bandgap are determined from previous publications and listed as follows: CuCrO 2 , MoO x , pp-sprio-OMeTAD, pm-sprio-OMeTAD, SGT-407, OMeTPA-FA, CuBr, PTAA, and NPB …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the basis for Schiff could create an intermediary with the complex of the tyrosinase residue. Materials with copper content, such as copper triflate ( Chan et al, 2017 ), copper acetate ( Jin et al, 2022 ), copper bromide ( Javaid et al, 2022 ), and copper nanoparticles ( Ouygang et al, 2022 ), are essential for Mannich base reactions. Many enzymes, including trypsin ( Momeni et al, 2022 ), lipase ( Shomal et al, 2022 ), and proteases ( Heng et al, 2022 ), catalyse the one-pot multicomponent Mannich process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the commercialization of PSCs, we have to overcome its bottlenecks (i) by replacing the pricey materials in PSCs, (ii) by ameliorating the stability and (iii) by improving the device performance (current density and PCE). [1][2][3] To replace the expensive metal electrode (Au or Ag) and unstable organic hole transport material (Spiro OMeTAD, which is a pricier one), a low-cost conductive carbon electrode was substituted for both. This architecture is called carbon electrode-based perovskite solar cells (C-PSC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%