“…The ongoing debate about how to categorize coping strategies presents itself here and makes it difficult to compare, contrast, and synthesize the findings of studies that were retrieved. To illustrate briefly, some researchers (e.g., Frey, 2007) have referred to cognitive (e.g., altering thought processes, perspective taking), emotional (e.g., social support, visualization), and behavioral (e.g., exercise, reading) coping strategies, while others (e.g., Thelwell, Weston, & Greenlees, 2010) have used problem-(e.g., talking with others), emotion-(e.g., self-talk), avoidance-(e.g., consuming alcohol), appraisal-(e.g., reflection), and approach-focused categories (e.g., goal-setting). In other research, Didymus (2016) examined coping as an adaptive process and used seven families of coping (dyadic coping, escape, information seeking, negotiation, problem solving, selfreliance, and support seeking) that each relate to a different function in adaptation to categorize the strategies that coaches used.…”