1993
DOI: 10.1300/j012v05n01_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with Separation:

Abstract: This study is a descriptive analysis of the adaptation responses of inmates at a correctional institution for women located in the midwest of the United States. Data for the study were collected and analyzed using a qualitative methodological approach. This investigation extends the literature on women prisoners by examining the inmates' perceptions of the deprivations of incarceration; how inmates respond to the deprivations of incarceration; and the impact that relationships outside of prison has on the inma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Female prisoners may bond with one another through the recreation of family units (i.e., pseudo families) inside prison walls (Giallombardo, 1966. ) Family creation could serve as a coping mechanism to ameliorate the pains associated with incarceration (i.e., the separation from one's family and children), and they appear to be primary in meeting and fulfilling the emotional needs of the female prisoner (DeBell, 2001;Huggins, Capeheart, & Newman, 2006;Jones, 1993;Severance, 2005). Other works find that the nature of America's female prison "pseudo family" may be evolving, and correspondingly, diminishing in importance (Fox 1984;Greer, 2000;Propper, 1982;Severance, 2005).…”
Section: Attachment For Girls and Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female prisoners may bond with one another through the recreation of family units (i.e., pseudo families) inside prison walls (Giallombardo, 1966. ) Family creation could serve as a coping mechanism to ameliorate the pains associated with incarceration (i.e., the separation from one's family and children), and they appear to be primary in meeting and fulfilling the emotional needs of the female prisoner (DeBell, 2001;Huggins, Capeheart, & Newman, 2006;Jones, 1993;Severance, 2005). Other works find that the nature of America's female prison "pseudo family" may be evolving, and correspondingly, diminishing in importance (Fox 1984;Greer, 2000;Propper, 1982;Severance, 2005).…”
Section: Attachment For Girls and Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, utilizing data from a personal blog written by a woman sentenced to serve one year and one day in a federal women's prison is an appropriate methodological choice to examine self-effi cacy. Furthermore, using CC as the theoretical framework vastly extends ethnographic research on the incarceration experiences of women as only a handful of studies have been conducted since the development of this approach in the mid-1990s (Bozkurt & Aresti, 2018;Jones, 1993;Kuhlmann, 2005). It also sheds light on how and when incarcerated women are able to demonstrate self-effi cacy despite their confi nement, as well as recognizing some of the barriers to those eff orts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%