2006
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606068338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense

Abstract: Research into the management of interorganizational relationships has hitherto primarily focused on problems of coordination, control, and to a lesser extent, legitimacy. In this article, we assert that partners cooperating in such relationships are also confronted with 'problems of understanding'. Such problems arise from differences between partners in terms of culture, experience, structure and industry, and from the uncertainty and ambiguity that participants in interorganizational relationships experience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
312
1
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
8
312
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Joint-venture structures and formal contracts can replicate key elements of hierarchy (Stinchcombe, 1985)-such as standard operating procedures and hierarchical 12 The assumption of organizational inertia has especially important implications for partner selection: because the partners will have a difficult time adapting their organizational structures and resources to the needs of the alliance, it is critical for the long-term evolution of the collaboration to select partners with a high level of fit to the task at hand and to one's own organization's resources. controls-that clarify and formalize the division of labor, overcome individuals' bounded rationality and limited span of attention (Gulati & Singh, 1998), and bridge cultural differences (Vlaar, Van den Bosch, & Volberda, 2006).…”
Section: The Coordination Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint-venture structures and formal contracts can replicate key elements of hierarchy (Stinchcombe, 1985)-such as standard operating procedures and hierarchical 12 The assumption of organizational inertia has especially important implications for partner selection: because the partners will have a difficult time adapting their organizational structures and resources to the needs of the alliance, it is critical for the long-term evolution of the collaboration to select partners with a high level of fit to the task at hand and to one's own organization's resources. controls-that clarify and formalize the division of labor, overcome individuals' bounded rationality and limited span of attention (Gulati & Singh, 1998), and bridge cultural differences (Vlaar, Van den Bosch, & Volberda, 2006).…”
Section: The Coordination Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the standard adopted 10 , the partnership goals common understanding plays a central role in the collaborative effort between parties and allows different views and expectations of the relationship to achieve congruence. It reinforces the argument that partnership results should focus not only on teaching, but also in the relationship with people assisted and satisfaction of all parties involved 5 .…”
Section: Comunicação Saúde Educação 2015; 19(54):537-47mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reveal that nurses are developing a significant educational action often without adequate instrumentation and in a solitary way. The theoretical reference adopted 6,10 shows the individual's role importance in the interorganizational cooperation because even with contracts the work is done by people, and they have institutional roles. At the same time, such functions are full of subjectivity, and there is also a personal role.…”
Section: Comunicação Saúde Educação 2015; 19(54):537-47mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations