2014
DOI: 10.25225/fozo.v63.i4.a5.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping with nest predation risk in a species-rich bird community inhabiting a Siberian wetland

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, egg survival may be ensured by the presence and aggressive behaviour of the parent (e.g. [14][15][16][17]). The level of aggression may vary as the clutch approaches independence or over the course of the breeding season, affected by the reproductive value of the clutch and the breeding opportunities that remain to the parents [1,5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, egg survival may be ensured by the presence and aggressive behaviour of the parent (e.g. [14][15][16][17]). The level of aggression may vary as the clutch approaches independence or over the course of the breeding season, affected by the reproductive value of the clutch and the breeding opportunities that remain to the parents [1,5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the risk of predation can be reduced in such aggregations through defensive or dilution mechanisms (Larsen and Moldsvor 1992, Larsen and Grundetjern 1997). The species passively protecting their nest against predators and relying more on nest crypsis can benefit from shared nesting near active defenders (Cramp and Simmons 1983) who can increase their nest success (Larsen and Grundetjern 1997, Šálek and Šmilauer 2002, Sládeček et al 2014, Rocha et al 2016). All these reasons may increase the attractiveness of nesting in both conspecific and heterospecific aggregations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetland bird communities are highly diverse in terms of species richness and habitat requirements (Paracuellos 2006, Żmihorski et al 2016). Many species of these communities breed in groups and use different anti‐predator tactics (Gochfeld 1984, Sládeček et al 2014, Cunningham et al 2016). Distinguishing the multiple drivers of nest site choice, possibly extending far beyond the exclusive selection of preferred habitat, can be particularly important from a conservation perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this rule does not require a heterospecific attraction parameter, suggesting that individuals may be optimizing colony size as a tradeoff between attracting females and competing with conspecific males for mating opportunities. Further, any benefits and costs for nesting within a mixed species colony likely will be asymmetric (Groom , Ellis and Good ), and different compositions of con‐ and heterospecifics may influence antipredator behaviors and breeding success (Ellis and Good , Sridhar et al , Sládeček et al ). The nest density of the species using conspicuous and sometimes aggressive antipredator behavior could also shape patterns in predation risk for nearby nests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, 'eavesdropping' on alarm calls can reduce the probability of detection by predators (Magrath et al 2015). Descriptive studies of heterospecific nesting associations are relatively common (Quinn and Ueta 2008), but few studies have examined the mechanisms or the costs and benefits of the association to both species (but see Sládeček et al 2014). In one example, terns and skimmers nesting with sand-colored nighthawks Chordeiles rupestris had reduced hatching success due to increased time spent in antipredator behaviors and less time in parental care (Groom 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%