2015
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1036828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping Strategies and Psychological Outcomes: The Moderating Effects of Personal Resiliency

Abstract: Certain coping strategies alleviate stress and promote positive psychological outcomes, whereas others exacerbate stress and promote negative psychological outcomes. However, the efficacy of any given coping strategy may also depend on personal resiliency. This study examined whether personal resiliency moderated the effects of task-oriented, avoidance-oriented, and emotion-oriented coping strategies on measures of depression, anxiety, stress, positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life. Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
80
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
80
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with earlier studies [24,29,32] that posit relationship between coping strategies and psychological well-being. Previous studies also uphold the proposition that certain coping strategies alleviate stress and promote positive psychological outcomes, whereas others exacerbate stress and promote negative well-being [7,8]. The argument here is that the low per cent (29.2%) of the total variance explained in psychological well-being reflects the combination of both effective and non-effective coping strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with earlier studies [24,29,32] that posit relationship between coping strategies and psychological well-being. Previous studies also uphold the proposition that certain coping strategies alleviate stress and promote positive psychological outcomes, whereas others exacerbate stress and promote negative well-being [7,8]. The argument here is that the low per cent (29.2%) of the total variance explained in psychological well-being reflects the combination of both effective and non-effective coping strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…That is, those who effectively cope with daily hassles are more likely to experience higher levels of well-being than those who do not. However, previous studies uphold the thesis that certain coping strategies alleviate stress and promote positive psychological outcomes, whereas others exacerbate stress and promote negative wellbeing [7,8]. Similarly, the World Health Organization [9][10][11] in separate remarks has raised concerns for youths' mental health and psychosocial development in particular, and identified poor coping skills as one of several risk factors for ill health in adulthood and even premature death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 A robust literature in psychology also has implicated, defined, operationalized, and measured dimensions of motivation (both internal and external), as well as perceived locus of control. 32 In our working population, individuals with "professional" types of positions exhibited greater improvements on several cognitive measures compared to what was observed in the overall population, especially measures assessing executive functioning (DSST, Stroop, and TMT-B). It could be that individuals working in these types of positions, with presumably higher demands for executive functioning, are more resilient and have higher levels of motivation and/or internal locus of control and, thus, have a greater potential for cognitive improvement during treatment with vortioxetine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although certain coping strategies can alleviate stress and promote positive psychological outcomes, the efficacy of the coping strategy depends on the personal psychological resources of subjects, such as self-efficacy and resilience. 26 , 51 Therefore, self-efficacy, as a modifiable factor, should be improved by effective interventions in RA patients for coping with mental health problems. The application of self-efficacy theory to arthritis self-management intervention has been widely developed, which consistently has shown significant early and sustained benefits that are attributed to the change in self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%