2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00372.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping Processes of Couples Experiencing Infertility

Abstract: This study explored the coping processes of couples experiencing infertility. Participants included 420 couples referred for advanced reproductive treatments. Couples were divided into groups based on the frequency of their use of eight coping strategies. Findings suggest that coping processes, which are beneficial to individuals, may be problematic for one's partner. Couples where men used high amounts of distancing, while their partner used low amounts of distancing, reported higher levels of distress when c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
72
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was an unexpected finding, as coping strategies which are related to reduced infertility stress are assumed to be predictive of increased relationship satisfaction. This finding, however, is consistent with the idea that coping strategies might be beneficial to an individual but may have a negative impact on the couple relationship (Peterson et al, 2006). In a related vein, it has been suggested that both male and female avoidance of problem discussion reflects a typical and stable marital type but may lead to long-term relationship dissatisfaction (Gottman, 1993).…”
Section: Standardized Betassupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was an unexpected finding, as coping strategies which are related to reduced infertility stress are assumed to be predictive of increased relationship satisfaction. This finding, however, is consistent with the idea that coping strategies might be beneficial to an individual but may have a negative impact on the couple relationship (Peterson et al, 2006). In a related vein, it has been suggested that both male and female avoidance of problem discussion reflects a typical and stable marital type but may lead to long-term relationship dissatisfaction (Gottman, 1993).…”
Section: Standardized Betassupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Research has examined how men and women cope using cognitive appraisal (Stanton, 1991;Stanton et al, 1991;Benyamini et al, 2004), and how they cope when treatments fail (Hynes et al, 1992;Litt et al, 1992;Terry and Hynes, 1998;Daniluk, 2001). There have also been studies examining the relationship between coping and marital adjustment (Slade et al, 1992;Peterson et al, 2003Peterson et al, , 2006Schmidt et al, 2005) and gender differences in coping with infertility (Jordan and Revenson, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, coping strategies which are beneficial to one individual may be problematic for his or her partner. Couples with men using high amounts of distancing, while their partner used low amounts of distancing, reported higher levels of distress [32].…”
Section: Significance and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, resilience may be displayed by remaining close as a couple despite failure to conceive a child, or becoming accustomed to the idea that one will never have children. Indeed, some have suggested that it may be the couples with higher marital quality that seek infertility treatment in the first place (Peterson et al 2006a). Resilience to infertility also may be considered as an outcome of the interconnections between the external factors, individual influences, and collective interactions and perceptions, which will be discussed.…”
Section: The Infertility Resilience Model (Irm): a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%