2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00476.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cophenylcaine spray vs. placebo in flexible nasendoscopy: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Practices vary across the UK on the use of topical preparation prior to flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy. In this double-blind study, we randomised 98 patients to receive cophenylcaine or placebo nasal spray before flexible nasendoscopy. A visual analogue scale (1-100) was used to record pain, unpleasantness of taste and overall discomfort experienced. Overall, the procedure was associated with minimal pain and discomfort in both groups. There was no significant difference in pain or overall discomfort experie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Our study has shown that using a local anaesthetic/vasoconstrictor nasal spray before performing NPL does not confer any significant benefit in reducing patient pain, discomfort or unpleasantness during the procedure. Similar results have been obtained in other trials comparing local anaesthetic sprays with a placebo spray and/or no nasal preparations 6,8,9 but in most of these studies, other confounding variables were also present, such as the use of lubricant gel and multiple examiners involved in performing the NPL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 Our study has shown that using a local anaesthetic/vasoconstrictor nasal spray before performing NPL does not confer any significant benefit in reducing patient pain, discomfort or unpleasantness during the procedure. Similar results have been obtained in other trials comparing local anaesthetic sprays with a placebo spray and/or no nasal preparations 6,8,9 but in most of these studies, other confounding variables were also present, such as the use of lubricant gel and multiple examiners involved in performing the NPL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…8 In another study by Georgalas et al, unpleasantness of taste was also significantly increased for the co-phenylcaine group. 6 In our study when patients were asked to report on their unpleasantness feeling with the procedure including their experience with the spray itself, there was no significant difference seen between both groups. No patients had any choking or gagging sensations and there were no allergic reactions to the nasal spray.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flexible nasendoscopy is considered to be an unpleasant, painful, and uncomfortable procedure; consequently, many authors have tried different solutions to diminish the patient's discomfort, such as a nasal decongestant, topical nasal anesthesia using a cocaine solution, xylocaine or oxymetazoline, nasal lubricants, or simple saline irrigation . None of those solutions provided a clear advantage or reduced perceived pain, except for some positive experience with topical cocaine .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Studies involving adult participants undergoing nasendoscopy demonstrate that this procedure is somewhat uncomfortable and painful. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Several of these studies found that the participants' perception of discomfort was greater when a topical anesthetic was used on the nasal mucosa because of the unpleasant taste, [7][8][9]12 whereas the level of unpleasantness was found to be reduced in patients who received topical nasal vasoconstriction. 12 However, regardless of the type or presence of anesthetic, these studies revealed that adults perceive nasendoscopy as painful, 7,10,11 unpleasant, 7,9 and uncomfortable 8,11 to some degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%