2014
DOI: 10.1177/0278364914530482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination and navigation of heterogeneous MAV–UGV formations localized by a ‘hawk-eye’-like approach under a model predictive control scheme

Abstract: The final publication is available at http://ijr.sagepub.com/content/33/10/1393 Copyright noticeThe copyright to the Contribution identified above is transferred to SAGE Publications. The copyright transfer covers the sole right to print, publish, distribute and sell throughout the world the said Contribution and parts thereof, including all revisions or versions and future editions thereof and in any medium, such as in its electronic form (offline, online), as well as to translate, print, publish, distribute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant work includes spacecraft formation flying [1]- [3], UAV control [4], [5], coordinated control of land robots [6]- [8], and control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles [9], [10]. Research on cooperative flight of multirotor teams is particularly extensive (see [2], [3], [11]- [16], and references therein). In this context, the literature is mainly divided into two categories: centralized and decentralized cooperative control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant work includes spacecraft formation flying [1]- [3], UAV control [4], [5], coordinated control of land robots [6]- [8], and control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles [9], [10]. Research on cooperative flight of multirotor teams is particularly extensive (see [2], [3], [11]- [16], and references therein). In this context, the literature is mainly divided into two categories: centralized and decentralized cooperative control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed formation control mechanism is suited for the real-world deployment of autonomous robots relying on the onboard visual relative localization, which brings additional movement constraints to the MAV team. The method is based on a leader-follower technique, where the team of robots is stabilized by sharing knowledge of the leader's position within the formation (see the original leader-follower approach [41] designed for a group of ground robots (UGVs) and the extension of the leader-follower approach for heterogenous MAVs-UGVs teams in [42], [43] for details). The method presented in this section is an extension of our work introduced in conference paper [44], where only simulation results were presented and where the requirements on the onboard relative localization necessary for the HW experiments, which is the main contribution of this paper, were not included.…”
Section: Multi-robot Scenarios Demonstrating the Practical Usabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Saska et al [12] used a specificallyprogrammed hawk-eyed supervising element that controlled and corrected the position of another set of autonomous vehicles. This central orchestrator is aware of the entire system and is responsible of maintaining the formation when faced with obstacles or failures.…”
Section: Advantages Of Emergent Behavior For Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%