Although the humanitarian logistics coordination model in Indonesia is fairly effective, the role of each player remains unclear. For example, some of the activities that are sufficient to be done by one agency are in fact done by other institutions as well. This has resulted in inefficiency and ineffectiveness regarding on the handling of disaster relief goods. Therefore, it is essential to determine the role of each stakeholder involved in the management of natural disasters in order to improve the model. This study was conducted to provide the proposed model of humanitarian logistics coordination for developing the framework of coordination between stakeholders in the management of natural disasters, with the involvement of logistics players through the RASIC Chart method. and volunteers. The model of collaboration and coordination between the stakeholders still has some drawbacks, such as emergency responses that do not involve those who are competent in the field of logistics.This study was conducted to provide the proposed model of humanitarian logistics coordination for developing the framework of coordination between stakeholders in the management of natural disasters, with the involvement of logistics players. This framework is expected to be a reference in establishing the involvement of stakeholders and the roles of each party to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the management of natural disasters. In this paper, deductive methods are used to map stakeholders which are tied to disaster management and clarified through the RASIC Chart.
Research MethodA RASIC Chart will be used in this research. It has functions for recognizing the rules and competences of each humanitarian logistics stakeholder in Indonesia in a process that ensures that ownership, approval, support, consultation, and communication responsibilities are assigned [6]. The advantages of a RASIC chart is ensuring an obvious relationship between activities and resources, emphasizing distinct competences for every resource, and providing suggestions for communication planning [7]. Responsible represents the stakeholders who are responsible for accomplishing the activity, while approves represents the stakeholders who have authority to take an action. Support means the stakeholders who offer resources. Stakeholders who have to know the outcome of the implementation of the activities are referred to as informed. Finally, consulted refers to stakeholders who adopt the implementation suggestions indirectly [8]. A RASIC chart will ensure stakeholders that are required to know do indeed know and stakeholders who are not required to know will not [9]. Data are compiled by interviewing and surveys about coordination among the