Coordinating open-source software development

Čubranić, Davor; Booth, Kellogg S.

doi:10.1109/enabl.1999.805176

Cited by 22 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…are typically widely distributed, communication tends to be asynchronous, and to be supported electronically [5].…”

Section: Communication Channels Since Project Membersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are three parameters in any request from the client for suggestions. Two of the arguments are required: the first identifies anonymously the user, 5 and the second identifies artifact for which related items are sought. An optional third argument is intended to further describe the context of the query for additional tailoring of recommendations, although it is not used at this time.…”

Section: Hipikat Prototypementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts

Čubranić

Murphy

2003

25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.

Self Cite

209

223

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…are typically widely distributed, communication tends to be asynchronous, and to be supported electronically [5].…”

Section: Communication Channels Since Project Membersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hipikat Prototypementioning

confidence: 99%

Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts

Čubranić

Murphy

2003

25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.

Self Cite

209

223

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Open Source (OSS) projects represent the typical situation where coordination problems arise, since developers contribute from around the world, meet face-to-face infrequently, and need to coordinate virtually (Crowston et al, 2005). For example, the entry barrier is a problem that has been acknowledged by OSS developers (Cubranic and Booth, 1999): a newcomer needs to understand the existing code and read the available documentation. Usually, this is a very time consuming and tedious task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Multilingualism in Data Warehouse Development

Dediź

Stanier

2016

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ICEIS 2016 received 257 paper submissions from 42 countries in all continents, which makes it one of the largest conferences in the World in the area of Information Systems, thus demonstrating the success and global dimension of this conference. From these, 42 papers were selected for publication and presentation at the Conference as full papers. These numbers, leading to a full-paper acceptance ratio of 16%, show the intention of preserving a high quality forum for this conference, a quality that we intend to maintain in the future, for the next editions of this conference.The high number and high quality of the received papers imposed difficult choices in the selection process. To evaluate each submission, a double blind paper review was performed by the Program Committee, whose members are highly qualified researchers in ICEIS topic areas.All presented papers will be available at the SCITEPRESS Digital Library and will be submitted for indexation by Thomson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index (ISI), INSPEC, DBLP, EI (Elsevier Index) and Scopus.Additionally, a short list of presented papers will be selected to be expanded into a forthcoming book of ICEIS 2016 Selected Papers to be published by Springer in the LNBIP Series.The technical program of the conference included a panel and 4 invited talks delivered by internationally distinguished speakers, namely: Claudia Loebbecke (University of Cologne, Germany), Sergio Gusmeroli (TXT e-solutions SPA, Italy), Wil Van Der Aalst (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands) and Jan Vom Brocke (University of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein). Their participation positively contributes to reinforce the overall quality of the Conference and to provide a deeper understanding of the fields addressed by the conference.Moreover, ICEIS 2016 had a Doctoral Consortium on Enterprise Information Systems and 1 tutorial. We are thankful to the Conference Co-chairs (Olivier Camp and José Cordeiro) and Program Co-chairs (Slimane Hammoudi, Leszek Maciaszek and Michele M. Missikoff) for their dedication and hard work in organizing these events.We sincerely thank all the authors for their submissions and participation in ICEIS 2016. Furthermore, we would like to thank all the members of the program committee and reviewers, who helped us with their expertise, dedication and time. We would also like to thank the invited speakers for their excellent contribution in sharing their knowledge and vision and the workshop/special session chairs whose collaboration with ICEIS 2015 was much appreciated. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the professional support of the ICEIS 2016 team for all organizational processes. XIIIWe hope that all colleagues find this a fruitful and inspiring conference. We hope to contribute to the development of the Enterprise Information Systems community and look forward to having additional research results presented at the next edition of ICEIS, details of which are available at http://www.iceis.org. Slimane Hammoudi University of Cologne, GermanyAbstract:...

show abstract

“…The details of conduct, input and output elements, sequencing, and resource needs of tasks are central elements of any software development method and the core of this discourse (e.g., Cubranic and Booth 1999;Egyedi 2004).…”

Section: Software Development Methods As Socio-technical Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Members of any project move from peripheral roles to a core developer role in the proj ect through a merit-based process (Cubranic and Booth 1999). An individual' s technical expertise and participation in developing the product results in his/her inclusion in the core group of developers.…”

Section: Free/libre Open Source Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

Methods as Theories: Evidence and Arguments for Theorizing on Software Development

Sawyer

Annabi

Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coordinating open-source software development

Cited by 22 publications

References 8 publications

Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts

Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Multilingualism in Data Warehouse Development

Methods as Theories: Evidence and Arguments for Theorizing on Software Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About