2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.g002562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated Model Predictive Control of Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine and Power System

Abstract: Motivated by the growing need to accommodate large transient thrust and electrical load requests in future more-electric aircraft, a coordinated control strategy for a gas turbine engine, generators, and energy storage is developed. An advanced two-generator configuration, with each generator connected to a shaft of the gas turbine engine, is treated. Model predictive control maximizes system performance and protects this system against constraint violations. The controller design is exploits rate-based linear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first seven constraints are designed for safety protection, and the last two constraints are designed for performance optimization. To set up the engine constraints, the constraint inequality equation can be written as Equation (24). The surge margin on a high-pressure compressor is approximated from a linear function from the high-pressure shaft speed.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first seven constraints are designed for safety protection, and the last two constraints are designed for performance optimization. To set up the engine constraints, the constraint inequality equation can be written as Equation (24). The surge margin on a high-pressure compressor is approximated from a linear function from the high-pressure shaft speed.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, constraints to the engine parameters can be easily implemented to the MPC, which overcomes the problem of handling the parameters in LQR [22]. In comparison with H_∞ and NN, the MPC is simpler, which does not require an accurate dynamic model to initialize transient operation, and the engine constraints can be directly embedded in the control process [23,24]. Therefore, the constrained MPC method is the most suitable one for gas turbine transient process control and performance optimization, as it is fully capable of determining the control inputs and seeking the optimal route based on the prediction of engine dynamics to optimally satisfy all the engine constraints [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive methodologies like robust control [30], linear quadratic control [31,32], and model predictive and fuzzy control [33,34] are able to produce controllers robust enough to cover a large spectrum of states and uncertainties; they are however often computationally too complex as shown in the references. Another approach, which has already been often used in solution of control problems, is to design simpler specific controllers for specific operational states of the investigated dynamic system for example in an application using different controllers for gas turbine generator and power system of aeropropulsion system as described in [38]. In aviation, this approach is widely used in flight control systems with a broad spectrum of applicable algorithms [39] combined in modern avionic digital control systems [40] as well as engine control system switching control algorithms for optimal dynamic characteristics [41].…”
Section: Situational Control Methodology Framework Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the predictive properties and physical constraints can be directly included in the control framework, a model predictive controller is employed for the turbine engine system in [19], and the fuel and air flow are considered as physical constraints. The rate-based model for MPC design is introduced in [20], and errors between linear model predictions and the response of the actual nonlinear system is compensated by extra offset states. However, it is worth noting that the conclusions of above methods are mostly drawn from numerical simulations and have not been verified by any experimental test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%