IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2004.1495182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated flocking of UAVs for improved connectivity of mobile ground nodes

Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have been used by the militmy for surveillance and reconnaissance operutions for the past few decades. The recent prol$eratinn of wireless networking technologies enables the equipment of UAVs with wireless transceivers, and that can in turn allow them to communicate with the fnendly ground nodes as well as other UAVs. Since rugged ground terrain can result in significant signal attenuation, the gmund netwurk can be severely partitioned. Huwever the lower propagation lass between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the network can be tolerant to breaks by having robots store messages which cannot be transmitted until a route has been established . Interestingly, the high speed at which flying robots can change position also allows them to rapidly reposition themselves so as to optimise communication or repair breaches in the network (Basu et al, 2004;Dixon and Frew, 2009;Hauert et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the network can be tolerant to breaks by having robots store messages which cannot be transmitted until a route has been established . Interestingly, the high speed at which flying robots can change position also allows them to rapidly reposition themselves so as to optimise communication or repair breaches in the network (Basu et al, 2004;Dixon and Frew, 2009;Hauert et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing aerial robotic swarms use relative or global positioning information to navigate in their environment using either map-based strategies (Kuiper and NadjmTehrani, 2006;Parunak et al, 2005;Sauter et al, 2005;Elston and Frew, 2008;Flint et al, 2002;Lawrence et al, 2004;Pack and York, 2005;Yang et al, 2005), Reynolds' Flocking (Reynolds, 1987) or Artificial Physics (Spears et al, 2005) approaches (Basu et al, 2004;De Nardi and Holland, 2007;Holland et al, 2005;Kadrovach and Lamont, 2001;Merino et al, 2006), or predefined swarm formations (Vincent and Rubin, 2004). Other researchers have explored the use of artificial evolution to automatically determine position-aware swarm controllers (Gaudiano et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2004;Richards et al, 2005;Soto and Lin, 2005;Wu et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile scenarios remains largely unexplored area and a few approaches were considered in the literature so far. Basu et al [8] combined the number of connections to each UAV with a flocking algorithm to maximise the number of connected nodes at any given time. Approaches from [9,10] tested several communication metrics to find the best position or trajectory for a team of UAVs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%