2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative vehicular communications at intersections over Nakagami-m fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every vehicle has a communication coverage of 100 m and uses the 802.11p (WAVE) [ 49 ] protocol as the MAC protocol with a header size of 70 bytes. For the propagation delay and the propagation loss models [ 50 ], our simulations use the Constant Speed Propagation Delay Model [ 51 , 52 ] and the Nakagami Propagation Loss Model [ 53 , 54 ], respectively. We set the size of the requested content from 150 to 400 (MB).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every vehicle has a communication coverage of 100 m and uses the 802.11p (WAVE) [ 49 ] protocol as the MAC protocol with a header size of 70 bytes. For the propagation delay and the propagation loss models [ 50 ], our simulations use the Constant Speed Propagation Delay Model [ 51 , 52 ] and the Nakagami Propagation Loss Model [ 53 , 54 ], respectively. We set the size of the requested content from 150 to 400 (MB).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, providing the areas with seamless and high data rate internet connection to assist the existing communication infrastructures in the area. Also, NTFPs have a better line-of-sight clearance to assist not only Ground-based vehicular communications [9], but also aerial vehicular communications [10]. • Temporary Coverage: After a disaster, NTFPs are the perfect solution to bring the coverage after the communications infrastructures are destroyed.…”
Section: ) Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eVTOLs fly at an altitude of 300 m and are distributed according to a two-dimensional (2D) binomial point process with intensity λ eV = 10 eVTOLs; the UAVs fly at 100 m and are distributed according to a 2D homogeneous Poisson point process (HPPP) with intensity λ U AV = 5 × 10 −5 UAV/m 2 , pedestrians and ground vehicles are distributed according to a one-dimensional (1D) HPPP with intensity λ p = 1 × 10 −3 pedestrian/m 2 [25]. The NTFP is a tethered blimp flying at an altitude of 500 m, and the cellular tower mast is 50 m high.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%