1995
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00428-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative phenomena at grain boundaries during superplastic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the formation of mesoscopic shear planes ± stretches of several coplanar grain boundaries in a row which facilitate fast deformation via sliding with little accommodation ± during the superplastic deformation of metals with grain sizes in the micrometer-region is well supported by experiments. [12] These features have also been observed in nanocrystalline materials, both by computer simulation [13] and by experiment. [6] However, more systematic investigations are required to determine how frequent these features occur and how significantly they contribute to the deformation.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Sliding and Grain Rotationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, the formation of mesoscopic shear planes ± stretches of several coplanar grain boundaries in a row which facilitate fast deformation via sliding with little accommodation ± during the superplastic deformation of metals with grain sizes in the micrometer-region is well supported by experiments. [12] These features have also been observed in nanocrystalline materials, both by computer simulation [13] and by experiment. [6] However, more systematic investigations are required to determine how frequent these features occur and how significantly they contribute to the deformation.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Sliding and Grain Rotationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[21,22,23] However, in most regions (as marked by the letter B in Figure 7(a)), sliding occurred by grain groups, known as cooperative grainboundary sliding (CGBS), which is evidenced by lifting or heaving of a region containing several grains. [24,25] At a strain of 1.0, while the topography of the deformed specimen showed that most grains took part in GBS (Figure 7(b)), elongated groups of grains (marked by the letter C in Figure 7(b)) detected on the surface indicate that not all grains were involved in GBS as individual grains. At a strain of 1.3, nearly all grains took part in GBS, and most grains developed into striplike morphologies (Figure 7(c)).…”
Section: The Fsp Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of grain boundary sliding is often acknowledged. But whether grain boundary sliding is diffusion-accommodated [8][9][10][11], dislocation-accommodated [12,13], or a combination of both [14] remains unclear; moreover, the role of cooperative grain boundary sliding [15] or the effect of cavity formation [16] remains controversial. It seems reasonable to believe that more than one mechanism may be operating and that processing conditions and material characteristics will have a great effect on which ones are active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%