2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative monitoring, assessment, and management of fish spawning aggregations and associated fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photo or video documentation of courtship coloration or behaviors, swollen or distended abdomens, recent bite marks, or a species density three times the normal density at the site can also provide indirect evidence for the presence of spawning aggregations [ 8 , 45 , 46 ]. Most of these techniques were developed for use in relatively shallow (25–60 m) shelf-edge tropical waters [ 47 ], but can be adapted to the deeper, sometimes turbid waters of the SEUS [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo or video documentation of courtship coloration or behaviors, swollen or distended abdomens, recent bite marks, or a species density three times the normal density at the site can also provide indirect evidence for the presence of spawning aggregations [ 8 , 45 , 46 ]. Most of these techniques were developed for use in relatively shallow (25–60 m) shelf-edge tropical waters [ 47 ], but can be adapted to the deeper, sometimes turbid waters of the SEUS [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing evidence suggests that collaborative community‐centered partnerships supported by effective knowledge exchange and learning through social networks best supports societal transformations toward sustainability for small‐scale coastal fisheries (Armitage et al., 2009; Gutierrez, Hilborn, & Defeo, 2011). This shift to community‐led conservation and the challenges of implementing adaptive co‐management usually requires diverse stakeholder participation including scientists (Armitage et al., 2009; Hamilton, Potuku, & Montambault, 2011; Heyman et al., 2019) and aligns with global sustainable development and biodiversity conservation policy recommendations for strengthening partnerships, capacity building including science/technology, and integrating local knowledge.In the case of FSAs, we recognize that fisher’ knowledge of FSA locations and the timing of aggregations is unparalleled and is the primary mode of discovery for nearly all FSAs (Johannes, 1998).…”
Section: Linking Scientists Fishers and Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose a co‐conservation partnership defined here as a community‐centered, ecosystem‐informed conservation strategy, involving close dialogue and working relationship between fishers, managers, and scientists (Heyman, 2011; Heyman et al., 2019; Kobara, Heyman, Pittman, & Nemeth, 2013). Such a co‐conservation approach includes participatory monitoring and surveillance that integrates local knowledge with emerging scientific understanding and approaches, empowers fishers within the management process, and fosters voluntary compliance and sustainable fishing practices (Armitage et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2011).…”
Section: Linking Scientists Fishers and Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platforms provide essential fish habitat (e.g., breeding, feeding, recruitment, shelter) for diverse assemblages of large pelagic and demersal fish (Love et al, 2012;Krone et al, 2017). In the Gulf of Mexico, platforms furnish local and regional benefits to highly migratory species (Snodgrass et al, 2020) and serve as spawning habitats for other types of fish (Heyman et al, 2019). In some instances, platforms expanded particular fish populations in an otherwise habitat-limited bottleneck (i.e., red snapper Lutjanus campachanus; Gallaway trophic shifts.…”
Section: Reef Effects Of Us Oil and Gas Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%