2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative maximal covering models for humanitarian relief chain management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, each affected area is devoted to the nearest distribution center, and inventory is distributed among demand points fairly and equitably by presenting a new constraint. Balcik and Beamon (2008), Mete and Zabinsky (2010), Irohara, Kuo and Leung (2013), Rath and Gutjahr (2014), Rath and Gutjahr (2014), Bozorgi-Amiri and Khorsi (2016), Caunhye et al (2016), Rezaei-Malek et al (2016a), Rezaei-Malek et al (2016b, Condeixa et al (2017), Elçi and Noyan (2018), Li, Ramshani and Huang (2018), Tavana et al (2018), Torabi et al (2018) , Cotes and Cantillo (2019), Hu and Dong (2019), Noyan, Meraklı and Küçükyavuz (2019), Wang and Nie (2019), Chen ( 2020) focused on pre-disaster location and procurement problems as well as a distribution problem. Balcik and Beamon (2008) determined distribution centers location, the amounts of relief commodities stored at each center, and the share of each center in satisfying demands considering a criticality weight for each relief item, different coverage levels for each commodity with different priorities , and satisfying the larger amount of demand at the lower coverage level, in a network including a set of distribution centers and a demand point.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, each affected area is devoted to the nearest distribution center, and inventory is distributed among demand points fairly and equitably by presenting a new constraint. Balcik and Beamon (2008), Mete and Zabinsky (2010), Irohara, Kuo and Leung (2013), Rath and Gutjahr (2014), Rath and Gutjahr (2014), Bozorgi-Amiri and Khorsi (2016), Caunhye et al (2016), Rezaei-Malek et al (2016a), Rezaei-Malek et al (2016b, Condeixa et al (2017), Elçi and Noyan (2018), Li, Ramshani and Huang (2018), Tavana et al (2018), Torabi et al (2018) , Cotes and Cantillo (2019), Hu and Dong (2019), Noyan, Meraklı and Küçükyavuz (2019), Wang and Nie (2019), Chen ( 2020) focused on pre-disaster location and procurement problems as well as a distribution problem. Balcik and Beamon (2008) determined distribution centers location, the amounts of relief commodities stored at each center, and the share of each center in satisfying demands considering a criticality weight for each relief item, different coverage levels for each commodity with different priorities , and satisfying the larger amount of demand at the lower coverage level, in a network including a set of distribution centers and a demand point.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, the equitable distribution of goods along with determining transportation routes and required vehicles were examined. Li et al (2018) presented a cooperative maximal covering model where relief items were prioritized. In the studies conducted by Rath et al (2014), Bozorgi-Amiri and Khorsi (2016), Torabi et al (2018), Cotes and Cantillo (2019), and Hu and Dong (2019), a multi-sourcing problem 1 was used to procure relief items.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pasandideh et al [32] proposed a multiobjective hub MCLP to simultaneously maximize both network reliability and commodity flow. Taking into account the uncertainty related to the impact of disasters, Li et al [33] formulated a cooperative MCLP for the design of a humanitarian relief logistics network. Paul et al [34] formulated an improved biobjective MCLP for the network redesign of a large-scale emergency response system.…”
Section: Maximal Covering Location Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a few studies try to explain the forces associated with coordination. Lack of trust among NGOs is the main barrier to coordination [67]. The stability of partnerships can be destroyed by "free-riding" behavior [65].…”
Section: Ngos In Humanitarian Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%