2018
DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
2
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
42
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since formative assessment in group work is a rather neglected research area (Forsell et al, 2020), we wanted to investigate how formative assessment could take place at group level. Previous research (e.g., Ashman & Gillies, 1997;Black et al, 2003;Healy et al, 2018) using educational sessions has been shown to have a positive effect on both students learning and teachers practice. An expected outcome from the educational session was to increase teacher knowledge and experience concerning individual group work assessment and to provide an increased understanding of challenges connected to group work assessment.…”
Section: Design and Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, since formative assessment in group work is a rather neglected research area (Forsell et al, 2020), we wanted to investigate how formative assessment could take place at group level. Previous research (e.g., Ashman & Gillies, 1997;Black et al, 2003;Healy et al, 2018) using educational sessions has been shown to have a positive effect on both students learning and teachers practice. An expected outcome from the educational session was to increase teacher knowledge and experience concerning individual group work assessment and to provide an increased understanding of challenges connected to group work assessment.…”
Section: Design and Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…( Participant 2[3], facilitator, 07 August 2019) Literature also presents varied opinions with regard to group selection. Healy, Doran and McCutcheon (2018) promote the student self-selection of groups, whereas Jacobs (2017) believes that students often prefer to do self-selection of groups, yet this opposes the CL principle of grouping heterogeneously, which can assist with learning and social cohesion. McCrea et al (2016) point out the pros and cons of both methods of group selection.…”
Section: Group Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, authors such as Sharan (2002) or Slavin (1995), based on extensive research and practice support, have proposed different classifications of the available alternatives to put CL techniques into practice. For instance, small-group learning (Yamarik, 2007), group work (Healy, Doran & McCutcheon, 2018) or working in groups (Cottell & Millis, 1992;Opdecam et al, 2014;Wichadee & Orawiwatnakul, 2012) are different terms that refer to distinct learning tools through which CL can be implemented.…”
Section: Introduction To Cooperative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%