1971
DOI: 10.1038/newbio230089a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Interactions in Energy-dependent Accumulation of Ca2+ by Isolated Rat Liver Mitochondria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of uptake velocity carried out on several mitochondrial types (Bygrave et al, 1971;Scarpa and Graziotti, 1973) have yielded sigmoidal kinetics, with maximal values varying between 0.1 and 0.6 µmol per mg of prot per min at 25°C, indicating positive cooperativity (with Hill coefficients at about ~2.0). The search for the uniporter has been very intensive, but has yielded essentially no results.…”
Section: History and Properties Of The Ca 2+ Transport Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of uptake velocity carried out on several mitochondrial types (Bygrave et al, 1971;Scarpa and Graziotti, 1973) have yielded sigmoidal kinetics, with maximal values varying between 0.1 and 0.6 µmol per mg of prot per min at 25°C, indicating positive cooperativity (with Hill coefficients at about ~2.0). The search for the uniporter has been very intensive, but has yielded essentially no results.…”
Section: History and Properties Of The Ca 2+ Transport Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCU is blocked by ruthenium red (RuR) and a colorless ruthenium red derivative, Ru360 (25, 26). The MCU has activation and a transport site for Ca 2+ , thus exhibiting second order kinetics (27–29). Despite the wealth of pharmacologic and electrophysiological data describing the MCU, the molecular identity of the channel is still unknown.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Ca2+ Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the number that gives the order of transport) of the uniporter gave sigmoidal plots of transport velocity vs [Ca 2+ ] and showed that the mechanism was second order in [Ca 2+ ] [47, 48]. While there was some controversy over the value of 2 for the Hill coefficient, that value is generally accepted today partly because it is also strongly supported by the results of Vinogradov and Scarpa showing that the uniporter has both a transport site and a separate activation site [49].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Influx Mechanisms: The Uniportermentioning
confidence: 99%