Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative integrated noise reduction and node-specific direction-of-arrival estimation in a fully connected wireless acoustic sensor network

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we consider cooperative node-specific direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation in a fully connected wireless acoustic sensor network (WASN). We consider a scenario where each node is equipped with a local microphone array with a known geometry, but where the position of the nodes, as well as their relative geometry and hence the between-nodes signal coherence model is unknown. The local array geometry in each node defines node-specific DOAs with respect to a set of target speech sources an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each node k ∈ K MVDR minimizes the output power of its beamformer under a single linear constraint that steers the beam towards the location of the target speech source such that the target speech signal (as received at its reference microphone) is processed without distortion [26]. Finally, each node k ∈ K DOA estimates its node-specific DOA θ k from the target speech source [19]. We assume that the local microphone array geometry of the nodes k ∈ K DOA is known, but the position of these nodes as well as the relative geometry between them and the other nodes are unknown.…”
Section: Data Model and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Each node k ∈ K MVDR minimizes the output power of its beamformer under a single linear constraint that steers the beam towards the location of the target speech source such that the target speech signal (as received at its reference microphone) is processed without distortion [26]. Finally, each node k ∈ K DOA estimates its node-specific DOA θ k from the target speech source [19]. We assume that the local microphone array geometry of the nodes k ∈ K DOA is known, but the position of these nodes as well as the relative geometry between them and the other nodes are unknown.…”
Section: Data Model and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the noise correlation matrix, defined as Rnn = E{nn H }, is assumed to be either known or to be estimated in the 'noise-only' segments when the target speech source is silent. To distinguish between such segments, a Voice Activity Detection (VAD) is required (as explained in [19,27]). In the sequel, we use an overline to denote a correlation matrix that is estimated from the data, i.e.,R.…”
Section: Mwfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relative location of the nodes provides us with sufficient spatial information to implement a wireless microphone array (WMA). WMAs have many potential applications in distributed audio processing, such as speech enhancement [4], blind source separation and echo cancelation [5], speaker localization and tracking [6,7], and voice activity detection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%