2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2984523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Guidance Considering Detection Configuration Against Target With a Decoy

Abstract: We consider the scenario where two pursuers are required to intercept an enemy evader that launches a decoy. Under the assumption that all four aircrafts have first-order linear dynamic characteristics, a cooperative guidance law is designed in two stages: the unidentified decoy stage and the discriminated decoy stage. In the unidentified decoy stage, the predictive guidance law is designed based on the method of the highest probability interval (HPI). This guidance law can maximize the probability of intercep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the work in [15], the research in [16] introduced a more practical case by considering both the perpendicular acceleration and the tangential acceleration, and the results were further extended to communication failure case, where one of the group vehicles cannot get information from the others. e robust guidance law proposed in [17] could still achieve simultaneous arrival without the information of faulty vehicles, which was different from the unidirectional communication error in [16]. It should be noted that the aforementioned centralized law or distributed laws achieved the cooperative arrival by the consensus of the time-to-go estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by the work in [15], the research in [16] introduced a more practical case by considering both the perpendicular acceleration and the tangential acceleration, and the results were further extended to communication failure case, where one of the group vehicles cannot get information from the others. e robust guidance law proposed in [17] could still achieve simultaneous arrival without the information of faulty vehicles, which was different from the unidirectional communication error in [16]. It should be noted that the aforementioned centralized law or distributed laws achieved the cooperative arrival by the consensus of the time-to-go estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…e consensus of the flight time is achieved through communications among themselves. To the best of the author's knowledge, more interest has been directed to individual homing in the guidance literature, and rare instances of cooperative homing can be found except in [14][15][16][17], where the consensus of the vehicles' time-to-go estimates was addressed to synchronize the arrival time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%