2006
DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6684-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Financial Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooperative banks are defined as banks with a cooperative ownership structure that are mainly active in retail banking. According to Cuevas and Fisher (), cooperative banks are one of the diverse member‐owned financial intermediaries, such as credit unions, savings unions, and credit cooperatives. Their institutional governance, legal and regulatory status, and scale and service portfolios vary widely across regions and between developed and developing countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative banks are defined as banks with a cooperative ownership structure that are mainly active in retail banking. According to Cuevas and Fisher (), cooperative banks are one of the diverse member‐owned financial intermediaries, such as credit unions, savings unions, and credit cooperatives. Their institutional governance, legal and regulatory status, and scale and service portfolios vary widely across regions and between developed and developing countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite not being the dominant model in the banking sector, not-for-profit financial institutions, like credit unions, play an important role in many countries (Canning, Jefferson, & Spencer, 2003). However, literature on credit unions is little when compared to other financial institutions (Cuevas & Fischer, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variety of organizational forms may be explained by both government regulation and other forms of protection or by the specific market failures (asymmetric information) that are successfully addressed by these different organizational forms. In this way, the recent economic literature has argued that ownership structures and organizational forms are indeed an endogenous result of the rational choices made by agents facing market failures (Boscia and Di Salvo , Cabo , Cuevas and Fisher ). Cuevas and Fischer () identified three complementary theories to understand how institutional features deal with market failures: the agency theory, the property rights theory and the transaction costs theory.…”
Section: Credit Institutions' Ownership and Lending And Investment Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the recent economic literature has argued that ownership structures and organizational forms are indeed an endogenous result of the rational choices made by agents facing market failures (Boscia and Di Salvo , Cabo , Cuevas and Fisher ). Cuevas and Fischer () identified three complementary theories to understand how institutional features deal with market failures: the agency theory, the property rights theory and the transaction costs theory. The agency theory suggests that a cooperative or mutual bank experiences lower agency costs mainly due to the ‘peer‐monitoring’ mechanism, which reduces asymmetric information and monitoring costs, and to the alignment of members’ and management risk behaviour, as a consequence of the banks’ mutuality feature.…”
Section: Credit Institutions' Ownership and Lending And Investment Bementioning
confidence: 99%