2017
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative enhancement of translation by two adjacent microRNA-122/Argonaute 2 complexes binding to the 5′ untranslated region of hepatitis C virus RNA

Abstract: The liver-specific microRNA-122 (miR-122) binds to two conserved binding sites in the 5' UTR of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. This binding was reported to enhance HCV RNA replication, translation and stability. We have analysed binding of miR-122/Argonaute 2 (Ago2) complexes to these sites using anti-Ago2 co-immunoprecipitation of radioactively labelled HCV RNAs along with ectopic miR-122 in HeLa cells. Our results show that the miR-122 target sites can be addressed separately. When both target sites were addre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual analysis of Sites 1 and 2 alone revealed that Site 1 has a higher overall binding affinity than Site 2; however, miR-122 binding to Site 2 was more exothermic and entropically favoured suggesting that in this isolated system, Site 2 binding to miR-122 brings the system to a lower energy ordered state (Table 1). This is in agreement with previous results with a J6/JFH-1 (genotype 2a) isolate (52); but is in contrast to studies with Con 1b (genotype 1b), where miR-122 binding to Site 2 had a stronger binding affinity than Site 1 (22). Although both ITC experiments were done similarly, it is possible that our results vary due to differences in the sequences between these two genotypes as well as the specific lengths used for binding experiments of the individual sites, since the tail of miR-122 bound to Site 2 would be predicted to have extended binding into the Site 1 seed region in the absence of Site 1-bound miR-122 (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Individual analysis of Sites 1 and 2 alone revealed that Site 1 has a higher overall binding affinity than Site 2; however, miR-122 binding to Site 2 was more exothermic and entropically favoured suggesting that in this isolated system, Site 2 binding to miR-122 brings the system to a lower energy ordered state (Table 1). This is in agreement with previous results with a J6/JFH-1 (genotype 2a) isolate (52); but is in contrast to studies with Con 1b (genotype 1b), where miR-122 binding to Site 2 had a stronger binding affinity than Site 1 (22). Although both ITC experiments were done similarly, it is possible that our results vary due to differences in the sequences between these two genotypes as well as the specific lengths used for binding experiments of the individual sites, since the tail of miR-122 bound to Site 2 would be predicted to have extended binding into the Site 1 seed region in the absence of Site 1-bound miR-122 (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, at that time it was not clear which specific step in the HCV replication cycle may be affected: RNA translation, RNA synthesis, RNA genome stability and/or other steps. Later, it was shown that one such effector function of miR-122 is the stimulation of HCV translation ( Henke et al, 2008 ), confirmed by several other studies ( Bung et al, 2010 ; Jangra et al, 2010b ; Roberts et al, 2011 , 2014 ; Wilson et al, 2011 ; Fehr et al, 2012 ; Goergen and Niepmann, 2012 ; Zhang et al, 2012 ; Bradrick et al, 2013 ; Conrad et al, 2013 ; Huys et al, 2013 ; Nieder-Röhrmann et al, 2017 ). While the mechanisms of translation stimulation by the miR-122/Ago2 complexes binding to the 5′ UTR are not yet clear, changes in RNA template stability were shown not to be the primary cause for the effect of miR-122 on HCV translation ( Henke et al, 2008 ; Bradrick et al, 2013 ; Huys et al, 2013 ; Roberts et al, 2014 ; Nieder-Röhrmann et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: The Liver-specific Microrna-122mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The seed target nucleotides and the so-called supplementary binding region are separated by the SL I in target site 1, and by some intervening nucleotides conserved not to pair to miR-122 in target site 2. Due to the conserved proximity of both target sites in the HCV 5′ UTR, the two miR-122/Ago2 complexes bind cooperatively to these sites ( Thibault et al, 2015 ; Nieder-Röhrmann et al, 2017 ). This cooperative binding may be the reason for the observation that mutations in any of these two sites generally affect the downstream effector functions of these complexes – no matter which of the different effector functions is analyzed.…”
Section: The Liver-specific Microrna-122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five to six target sequences conserved in the HCV genome, two in the 5 UTR [62], one in the 3 UTR, and two to three in the NS5B coding region (depending on genotype) [63]. Cooperative binding of two miR-122 molecules to the two adjacent target sites in the HCV 5 UTR contributes to RNA stability by protecting against cellular nucleases [64,65] and has a positive effect on the efficiency of HCV translation [66][67][68][69][70][71][72]. Although some studies investigated the possible roles of the conserved potential miR-122 binding sites in the NS5B coding region and in the 3 UTR, it is not yet clear if physical binding of miR-122 to these sites results in effector functions [73][74][75][76], leaving some doubts why these sequences are conserved among HCV isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%