IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2010.5585979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Co-evolution with delta grouping for large scale non-separable function optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of decision variables to be optimized for the LSGO problem can reach up to 1,000 or more, whose general formulation can be expressed as follows: For solving such an LSGO problem, two typical methods have been widely discussed: the groupingbased method and non-grouping method [27]. The former method is applied for high-dimensional LSGO problems and classifies all the decision variables into several supgroups by some grouping methods, such as the random grouping method [28][29], delta grouping method [30], and differential grouping methods [31][32]. Then the decision variables located in different sup-groups are optimized cooperatively and their results are combined into the ultimate solution.…”
Section: Optimization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of decision variables to be optimized for the LSGO problem can reach up to 1,000 or more, whose general formulation can be expressed as follows: For solving such an LSGO problem, two typical methods have been widely discussed: the groupingbased method and non-grouping method [27]. The former method is applied for high-dimensional LSGO problems and classifies all the decision variables into several supgroups by some grouping methods, such as the random grouping method [28][29], delta grouping method [30], and differential grouping methods [31][32]. Then the decision variables located in different sup-groups are optimized cooperatively and their results are combined into the ultimate solution.…”
Section: Optimization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omidvar et al [15] proposed DECC-D (Differential Evolution with Cooperative Coevolution using Delta-Grouping) which uses delta value to identify interacting variables. Delta value corresponding to a decision variable is calculated by measuring the amount of change in it, in successive iterations.…”
Section: Based Variant Of Cma-es Called Cc-cma-es For Largementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other decomposition methods such as delta grouping [14], variable interaction learning [9], and differential grouping [6] are more sophisticated techniques that have a higher accuracy in detecting interacting variables. Since the focus of this research is not on investigating the effect of various grouping techniques, we confined our experiments to random grouping only.…”
Section: A Cooperative Co-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loop on line 4 forms the main co-evolutionary cycle. At the beginning of each cycle the subcomponents are reformed if a dynamic grouping algorithm such as random grouping [5] or delta grouping [14] is used. Static grouping algorithms such as differential grouping [6] are only called once at the beginning of the algorithm.…”
Section: A Cooperative Co-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation